The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN16LA228 · Final report

Cessna 172S accident near Deming, New Mexico, June 10, 2016

On June 10, 2016 at about 9:20 pm local time, a 2004 Cessna 172S, registered N21767, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Deming, New Mexico (Deming Municipal Airport). It was a business flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilots’ failure to maintain adequate control of the airplane during the initial climb after takeoff, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall at a low altitude. Contributing to the accident was the operation of the airplane above its maximum takeoff weight at a high density altitude at the time of the accident.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 10, 2016 · about 9:20 pm local time
Place
Deming, New Mexico · Deming Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172S, built 2004 · all 172Ss on the register
Registration
N21767 · no longer on the register · serial 172S9635
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Business flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilots were departing on a cross-country flight. A witness who saw the airplane shortly after takeoff observed the airplane turn back toward the airport, enter a steep right bank, and descend toward the ground. The airplane impacted terrain in a nose-down, right-wing-low attitude. Witnesses on a golf course next to the airport reported that airplane's engine was running at the time of impact. Neither pilot has any memory of the takeoff or the crash. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of a preimpact mechanical malfunction or failure of the flight control system or the engine that would have precluded normal operation. The propeller exhibited damage that was consistent with the engine producing power at impact. Calculations indicate that the airplane was at least 131 lbs over the maximum takeoff weight before the flight. The required takeoff distance and climb performance could not be determined because the airplane's weight exceeded the pilot operating handbook's performance chart parameters. However, overall airplane flight performance is reduced as the airplane's weight increases, resulting in a higher takeoff speed, longer takeoff run, reduced rate and angle of climb, and higher aerodynamic stalling speed. Additionally, the density altitude was about 7,736 ft at the time of the accident, which likely further increased the takeoff distance required for liftoff and adversely affected the engine power available and the climb rate. Given the available information, the pilots did not maintain adequate control of the airplane during the initial climb after takeoff, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall at a low altitude.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during takeoff defining event
  2. Collision during takeoff/land during takeoff

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Copilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Maximum weight › Capability exceeded
  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › High density altitude › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 300 hours in all; 200 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: May 5, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

Pilot-Rated Passenger

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,416.8 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, May 25, 2016; 37 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,550 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360-L2A (piston); 7,219 hours total
  • Operator: Air America Flight Center LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: DMN Deming NM at 9:20 pm
  • Destination: FST Fort Stockton TX
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 26, 8,018 ft by 75 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 97°F (36°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
  • Observation at 8:53 pm from DMN

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

12 documents, released by the NTSB on May 15, 2020. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.