The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN16FA333 · Final report

Cessna 172N accident near Terre Haute, Indiana, August 25, 2016

On August 25, 2016 at about 11:05 pm local time, a 1980 Cessna 172N, registered N17SK, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Terre Haute, Indiana (Sky King Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain a normal approach path to the runway, which resulted in the airplane colliding with a tree and a house during final approach. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's lack of recent flight experience.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 25, 2016 · about 11:05 pm local time
Place
Terre Haute, Indiana · Sky King Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172N, built 1980 · all 172Ns on the register
Registration
N17SK · no longer on the register · serial 17273809
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot, who was interested in purchasing the airplane, was conducting a local flight in the airport traffic pattern to evaluate the airplane. The pilot was seated in the left front seat, and a private-pilot-rated passenger, the airplane's owner, was seated in the right front seat. When the airplane turned onto final approach, it was below a normal approach path to the runway and at a slower-than-normal airspeed. The pilot performed a go-around and remained in the traffic pattern for another approach. During the second final approach, the airplane was again flying at a lower-than-normal altitude and a slow groundspeed when it collided with a 50-ft-tall tree about 1,355 ft short of the runway threshold. The airplane subsequently traveled about 190 ft before impacting a house. No witnesses reported hearing any engine anomalies during the accident flight. Additionally, the postaccident wreckage examination did not reveal any evidence of anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. It is likely that the pilot allowed the airplane to descend below a normal approach path to the runway, which resulted in the collision with the tree and the house. The pilot had not flown during the 11 months before the accident, and his most recent flight in the airplane make and model was completed more than 2.5 years before the accident. Additionally, the pilot had not completed a flight review during the 4 years since he received his pilot certificate, and, consequently, he did not demonstrate having an adequate level of flight proficiency on a recurring basis. The pilot's lack of recent flight experience likely contributed to his failure to maintain a normal approach path and the collision with the tree.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision during takeoff/land during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent/approach/glide path › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Recent experience › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tree(s) › Contributed to outcome
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Residence/building › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 121.4 hours in all; 12 in this make and model; 0 in the last 90 days; 0 in the last 30 days; 86.5 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 19, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

Pilot-Rated Passenger

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 135.5 hours in all; 135.5 in this make and model; 2.4 in the last 90 days; 1 in the last 30 days; 48.5 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: July 14, 2015
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 15,073 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 9, 2015; 48 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320-H2AD (piston); 9,555 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 3I3 Terre Haute IN at 10:17 pm
  • Destination: 3I3 Terre Haute IN
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 26, 3,557 ft by 50 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 280° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.03 inHg
  • Observation at 10:53 pm from HUF, 7 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

18 documents, released by the NTSB on March 21, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.