The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA20FA086 · Final report

Amateur-built II accident near Senoia, Georgia, January 25, 2020

On January 25, 2020 at about 10:12 pm local time, a 1980 amateur-built II, registered UNREG, was destroyed in an accident during maneuvering (aerobatics) near Senoia, Georgia (Big T Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s structural limitations while conducting previous aerobatic maneuvers, which resulted in an in-flight breakup of the airplane.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 25, 2020 · about 10:12 pm local time
Place
Senoia, Georgia · Big T Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built II, built 1980
Registration
UNREG · no longer on the register · serial M2-694
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to a previous owner of the experimental, amateur-built airplane, the pilot had flown aerobatic maneuvers in the airplane about 1 week before the accident, during which he exceeded the airplane’s never exceed speed of 230 mph by between about 20 to 25 mph. Additionally, two videos provided by a witness showed the airplane making two high-speed, low passes over the airport earlier on the day of the accident. The airplane owner stated that, after the pilot departed for the accident flight, the pilot flew over the local area for about 15 minutes and then performed a barrel roll. Video evidence revealed six rolls. Shortly thereafter, the canopy and vertical stabilizer separated, and the airplane subsequently descended nose down and impacted terrain. During the descent and just before impact, the outboard section of the right horizontal stabilizer separated. Examination of the canopy frame revealed that it had separated due to overstress and that it did not have reinforcing gussets installed per a kit manufacturer canopy frame revision issued in 1984. Metallurgical examination of the vertical stabilizer revealed ratchet marks along the internal edge of the aft doubler rib consistent with stress and multiple fatigue cracks. Based on the evidence, it is likely that the pilot previously exceeded the airplane’s structural limits, which led to the in-flight separation of the vertical stabilizer and canopy.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aircraft structural failure during maneuvering (aerobatics) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Capability exceeded

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 11,000 hours in all; 55 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,379.5 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, May 29, 2019
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,500 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360-B1E (piston); 4,992 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 64GA Senoia GA at 10:00 pm
  • Destination: 64GA Senoia GA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 34, 2,050 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 310° at 12 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 46°F (8°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.07 inHg
  • Observation at 9:53 pm from FFC, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

18 documents, released by the NTSB on February 24, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under UNREG the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2026-07-07CEN26LA246 · accident near Hooker, OK · substantial damage · minor injuries
2026-02-28CEN26LA131 · accident near Van Burensburg, IL · substantial damage · no injuries
2025-10-13ERA26LA017 · accident near Gaffney, SC · substantial damage · serious injuries
2025-09-27CEN25LA397 · accident near Harvard, IL · substantial damage · no injuries
2025-09-12CEN25LA385 · accident near Rossville, IN · substantial damage · serious injuries
2025-07-07CEN25LA242 · incident near Ingram, TX · minor damage · no injuries
2025-06-18DCA25WA305 · accident near N/A · serious injuries
2025-05-01OPS25LA034 · incident near Washington, DC
2025-04-11CEN25LA155 · accident near Brady, TX · substantial damage · serious injuries
2025-01-30DCA25MA108 · accident near Washington, DC · destroyed · fatal

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.