Amateur-built AVID/KITFOX FLYER accident near Oakland, Pennsylvania, September 28, 2025
On September 28, 2025 at about 7:40 pm local time, a 2015 amateur-built AVID/KITFOX FLYER, registered N533SE, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Oakland, Pennsylvania (John Murtha Johnstown/Cambria airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot/owner’s failure to accurately determine the airplane’s weight and performance limitations before initiating the takeoff. Contributing to the outcome was the flight instructor’s improper engine power management and landing flare, which resulted in a hard landing.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- September 28, 2025 · about 7:40 pm local time
- Place
- Oakland, Pennsylvania · John Murtha Johnstown/Cambria · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built AVID/KITFOX FLYER NO SERIES, built 2015
- Registration
- N533SE · registry record · serial M002
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The purpose of the flight was for the flight instructor to provide tailwheel training to the pilot receiving instruction, who did not hold an endorsement to flying tailwheel-equipped airplanes, and who had recently purchased the experimental amateur-built airplane. It was the first flight for either pilot in this make and model of airplane and the takeoff was performed by the pilot. The flight instructor stated that airplane’s acceleration was slower than he expected, but given his lack of experience in this airplane, he did not feel it was abnormal. When the airplane was about 50 ft above ground level, the pilot and flight instructor stated that the airplane stopped climbing. The pilots then elected to land on the remaining runway and the flight instructor took over controls, lowered the airplane’s nose, and reduced engine power. He noted that the airplane “dropped quick,” so he then increased the engine power. Upon touchdown, both landing gear collapsed, and the fuselage sustained substantial damage. The flight instructor further described that the airplane had touched down “hard,” but he was surprised that the landing gear had collapsed and that he landed other airplanes in the past with similar force and not experienced any problems. Prior to the flight, the pilot performed a weight and balance calculation and determined that the ramp weight would be 1,156 lbs, about 6 lbs above the airplane’s maximum demonstrated weight. The pilot stated that he expected that 6 lbs of fuel would be consumed during taxi and runup. Postaccident review of the weight and balance completed by the pilot revealed was based on the airplane’s original empty weight, which did not account for multiple propeller model changes, the addition of avionics, structural repairs, and a modification of the landing gear design. Additionally, the weather conditions at the time of the accident included a density altitude that exceeded 3,000 ft. Based on the Federal Aviation Administration Koch chart, this density altitude correlated to a loss in rate of climb performance of 35%. The flight instructor stated that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures of the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot also stated that there were no engine problems, but he reported that the experimental amateur-built airplane’s landing gear had been custom built and had not been designed by the airplane’s kit manufacturer. He also stated that the landing gear had previously collapsed and had been repaired by the previous owner/operator. A review of the airplane’s maintenance logs confirmed that the airplane had been damaged and repaired on at least three documented occasions. Given the uncertain nature of the airplane’s weight and balance, it is likely that the airplane was being operated near or in excess of its maximum gross weight during the accident takeoff. Combined with the detrimental performance impact of the density altitude at the time, it is likely that the airplane was unable to climb out of ground effect during the takeoff due to these combined factors. After aborting the takeoff, the flight instructor’s power management, in combination with the airplane’s excessive weight, resulted in a hard landing and the subsequent landing gear collapse. Whether the landing gear collapse was solely the result of that hard landing, or had been exacerbated by the landing gear’s design, or its previous damage and repair, was not determined.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Landing gear collapse during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event
- Attempted remediation/recovery during takeoff
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Weight/balance calculations › Unknown/Not determined
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent rate › Not attained/maintained
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Instructor/check pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: commercial pilot
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 270 hours in all; 0 in this make and model; 3 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 205 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: February 3, 2025
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
Flight instructor
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 1,400 hours in all; 0 in this make and model; 200 in the last 90 days; 87 in the last 30 days; 1,350 as pilot in command; 850 on instruments
- Last flight review: October 29, 2024
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 225.2 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, June 25, 2025
- Maximum gross weight: 1,150 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Rotax 582DCDI (piston); 88 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: JST Johnstown PA at 7:30 pm
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 33, 7,004 ft by 150 ft
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: scat at 5,000 ft
- Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
- Altimeter: 30.18 inHg
- Observation at 3:54 pm from JST, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): METAR KJST 281954Z AUTO VRB04KT 10SM SCT050 25/13 A3018 RMK AO2 SLP209 T02500128 $
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 |
Photographs from the investigation 4 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them
Photograph 1 – N533SE Accident Prior to Recovery
Photograph 2 – Left Forward Landing Gear Bracket Torn from Frame
Photograph 3 – Left Forward Landing Gear Strut Punched Through Cockpit Floor
Photograph 4 – Right Landing Gear Collapse, Brackets Still AttachedThe NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
11 documents, released by the NTSB on February 12, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 (Pilot) | PDF, 10 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 (Flight Instructor) | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Memorandum for Record A�� Telephone Interview, Pilot (Pilot) | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Memorandum for Record A�� Telephone Interview, Pilot (Flight Instructor) | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Memorandum for Record A�� Telephone Interview, FAA Inspector | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Operating Handbook Found in Airplane | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Pilot-provided Weight and Balance | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 8 | Maintenance Records | PDF, 40 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Memorandum for Record - Documentation of Airplane Modifications | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 10 | Investigation Photographs | PDF, 6 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 11 | FAA Koch Chart | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
