Cessna 172K accident near Spartanburg, South Carolina, September 20, 2024
On September 20, 2024 at about 7:43 pm local time, a 1969 Cessna 172K, registered N7037G, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Spartanburg, South Carolina (Spartanburg Downtown Memorial airport). It was a flight test under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
Maintenance personnel’s failure to follow the engine manufacturer’s maintenance guidance, which resulted in the assembly of the engine with an obstructed oil passage, a subsequent lack of lubrication to the front main bearing, and a total loss of engine power.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- September 20, 2024 · about 7:43 pm local time
- Place
- Spartanburg, South Carolina · Spartanburg Downtown Memorial · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 172K, built 1969 · all 172Ks on the register
- Registration
- N7037G · registry record · serial 17258737
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Flight test · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot was conducting a local “break-in” flight for the airplane’s recently-installed engine. During the initial climb, the engine’s rpm started to decline, followed by a total loss of engine power. The pilot performed a forced landing to a field and the airplane nosed over during the landing roll, resulting in substantial damage to the airplane’s fuselage, wings, rudder, and vertical stabilizer. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the engine’s crankshaft was not free to rotate. The engine’s front main bearing was discolored and exhibited rotational abrasion at its rear oil passage area and corresponding crankshaft surface. Additionally, insect-related debris, soil/clay/mud, and lubricating oil were obstructing the crankcase oil header and the front main bearing’s aft oil passage. The signatures of lubrication distress observed on the front main bearing were consistent with oil starvation as a result of the obstructions found within the engine’s lubrication system. Review of the engine’s maintenance records showed that crankcase was repaired nearly 12 years before the accident and that the engine was overhauled 2 years later. The engine did not accrue any time in service prior to its installation on the accident airplane about 1 month before the accident (about 10 years after the overhaul). The mechanic who performed the engine overhaul reported that the crankcase was stored in a hangar for several months before he acquired it and that he did not remember cleaning and verifying that the oil passages of the crankcase were unobstructed before assembly. According to the engine manufacturer’s overhaul manual, all oil passages should be cleaned with suitable brushes then flushed thoroughly with clean solvent and compressed air. Based on the available evidence, an insect likely infiltrated the crankcase and made a nest in the oil passages during the more than 2 years it was stored. Maintenance personnel then failed to clean and verify the oil passages were free of obstruction before assembly of the engine, which resulted in a lack of lubrication to the front main bearing and a subsequent total loss of engine power.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (total) during initial climb defining event
- Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
- Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip engine power section › Inadequate inspection
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Forgotten action/omission › Maintenance personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 1,716.4 hours in all; 58.2 in this make and model; 102.3 in the last 90 days; 36.8 in the last 30 days; 1,623.8 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: September 4, 2024
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: minor injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 4,711.3 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, August 22, 2024; 0.1 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-320-D2G (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 5, 5,852 ft by 100 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 040° at 6 knots
- Visibility: 7 statute miles
- Sky: scat at 4,900 ft
- Temperature: 86°F (30°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
- Altimeter: 29.90 inHg
- Observation at 3:35 pm from SPA, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KSPA 201935Z AUTO 04006KT 7SM SCT049 SCT065 30/16 A2990 RMK AO2
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
10 documents, released by the NTSB on August 19, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NTSB 6120 1 Form | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Mor Mechanic Statement | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 3 | Mor Divco Checklist | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 4 | Lycoming Overhaul Manual Excerpts | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Maintenance Records | PDF, 12 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Photo Array | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Examination Summary | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Mor NTSB Materials Laboratory Report | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 14 pages | View Download |
| 10 | Wreckage Release Form | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
About this page
Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA24LA388.
