The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN16LA154 · Final report

Air Tractor INC AT 502 accident near Kilbourne, Louisiana, April 18, 2016

On April 18, 2016 at about 2:10 pm local time, a 1989 Air Tractor INC AT 502, registered N301LA, was destroyed in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Kilbourne, Louisiana. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The failure of the operator to comply with the terminating action of the airworthiness directive, which resulted in the subsequent failure and separation of the vertical stabilizer due to fatigue.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 18, 2016 · about 2:10 pm local time
Place
Kilbourne, Louisiana · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Air Tractor INC AT 502, built 1989 · all AT 502s on the register
Registration
N301LA · no longer on the register · serial 502-0037
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

**This report was modified on March 23, 2026. Please see the docket for this accident to view the original report.** The commercial pilot was conducting his second spray load application of the day to a field located about 1/4 mile north of the accident site. A farmer stated that the pilot's last passes were to finish spraying a tight area of the field that had trees at the end. A witness near the accident site saw the airplane turn at low altitude and then rapidly descend until ground impact. The airplane was destroyed by impact forces and a postimpact fire. Postaccident examination of the wreckage and ground scars revealed that the airplane impacted terrain in a steep, nose-down attitude. Examination of the engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot had hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, it is unlikely that the pilot's underlying hypertension and LVH contributed to the accident. In December of 2025, the vertical stabilizer of the airplane was located in a wooded area northeast of the location where the main wreckage came to rest. Metallurgical examination of the vertical stabilizer revealed fractured surfaces on both fitting lobes with extensive post-fracture smearing damage. Thumbnail shaped areas contained macro features consistent with fatigue cracking which emanated from the forward face of the attach plate. A service letter and airworthiness directive required periodic examination of the vertical fin front spar fitting for cracks with the installation of the steel doubler as a “terminating action.” There was no evidence that the steel doubler had been installed. Maintenance records for the accident airplane were not made available, and investigators were unable to determine if the periodic examination for cracks was accomplished. It is most likely that the vertical stabilizer separated during the aerial application flight due to the progressive fatigue cracking within the front spar fitting. This separation resulted in a loss of airplane control and subsequent impact with terrain.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
  2. Aircraft structural failure during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Empennage structure › Vertical stab misc structure › Fatigue/wear/corrosion
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Empennage structure › Vertical stab misc structure › Failure
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Empennage structure › Vertical stab misc structure › Not serviced/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › (general) › Other

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 13,261 hours in all; 2,463 in this make and model; 100 in the last 90 days; 50 in the last 30 days; 13,261 as pilot in command; 0 on instruments
  • Last flight review: March 15, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 9,585 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, February 17, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 9,400 lb
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Pratt And Whitney PT6A-34G (turboprop); 7,022 hours total
  • Fire on the ground
  • Operator: Pioneer Flying Service INC

The flight

  • Departed from: PRI Pioneer LA at 2:00 pm
  • Destination: PRI Pioneer LA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 080° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 59°F (15°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.23 inHg
  • Observation at 2:15 pm from KBQP, 32 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

14 documents, released by the NTSB on March 6, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.