The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR24LA248 · Final report

Cessna 150M accident near Ritzville, Washington, July 15, 2024

On July 15, 2024 at about 6:45 pm local time, a 1977 Cessna 150M, registered N714PW, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Ritzville, Washington (Pru Fld airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Maintenance personnel’s improper installation of the No. 2 cylinder exhaust valve, which allowed the valve to drop into the cylinder and resulted in a total loss of engine power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 15, 2024 · about 6:45 pm local time
Place
Ritzville, Washington · Pru Fld · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 150M, built 1977 · all 150Ms on the register
Registration
N714PW · no longer on the register · serial 15079336
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was conducting a cross-country flight when he heard a “loud metal sound” followed by a partial loss of engine power. While troubleshooting the rough-running engine, he diverted to a local airport. The airplane then had a total loss of engine power, and the pilot initiated an off-airport landing to an open field. During the landing roll, the nose landing gear collapsed and the airplane impacted terrain, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed mechanical damage to the No. 2 cylinder’s combustion dome and piston face. The keeper halves for the exhaust valve were missing, and the keeper shoulder on the valve stem showed fretting contact damage consistent with relative movement between the keeper halves and the valve stem. Contact wear patterns were also observed on the exhaust valve spring seat. The keepers likely became dislodged during the accident flight, allowing the valve to drop into the combustion chamber, where it was repeatedly impacted by the piston. The valve was then pushed back into the exhaust cavity, where the valve stem impacted the head adjacent to the exhaust valve guide. The fragmentation of the piston and exhaust valve likely led to the loss of engine power. Possible causes for dislodged keepers include improper installation or weak valve springs. The height of the intake and exhaust valve springs were similar, so weak springs are unlikely. Thus, the keepers were likely not installed properly before the accident. With improper installation, failure can be expected relatively soon after installation. Although the last record of work that would require disassembly of the valve to complete (a top overhaul) was dated about 36 years before the accident flight, the engine was reported to have only accrued about 320 hours since repair of the cylinders. It is likely that the keeper halves were not properly seated on the exhaust valve shoulder when the valve was installed. This incorrect installation allowed the keepers to eventually work their way out of position, allowing the valve to drop into the combustion chamber.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › (general) › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Installation › Maintenance personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 402.3 hours in all; 97.8 in this make and model; 134.5 in the last 90 days; 59.2 in the last 30 days; 298.2 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 29, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,757.8 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 25, 2024
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,600 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental Motors O-200-A (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: SFF Spokane WA at 5:39 pm
  • Destination: YKM Yakima WA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 52°F (11°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.96 inHg
  • Observation at 11:52 am from KMWH, 38 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KMWH 151852Z 21009KT 10SM CLR 31/11 A2996 RMK AO2 SLP134 T03110106

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Photographs from the investigation 4 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on July 23, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N714PW the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1982-11-18CHI83LA041 · accident near Middletown, OH · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.