The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR24LA152 · Final report

Cessna 182H accident near Three Forks, Montana, May 10, 2024

On May 10, 2024 at about 4:30 pm local time, a 1965 Cessna 182H, registered N2388X, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff (rejected takeoff) near Three Forks, Montana (Three Forks Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s inadequate preflight inspection, which resulted in an attempted departure with the flight control lock device installed, and subsequent nose landing gear collapse.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 10, 2024 · about 4:30 pm local time
Place
Three Forks, Montana · Three Forks Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 182H, built 1965 · all 182Hs on the register
Registration
N2388X · registry record · serial 18256288
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that shortly after liftoff, the airplane pitched down unexpectedly and bounced on the runway. The pilot realized the control lock device was still installed but was unable to remove it before the aircraft impacted the runway firmly enough to collapse the nose gear. The pilot reported that due to the installation of new avionics, he modified the original flight control lock device, and it no longer covered the ignition switch. During the preflight inspection, he failed to remove the modified flight control lock. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the forward fuselage and left wing. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during takeoff (rejected takeoff) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Preflight inspection › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Gust lock or damper › Incorrect use/operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 1,295 hours in all; 200 in this make and model; 1,295 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: February 11, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,050 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, August 9, 2023
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,800 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-470-R (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 21, 5,099 ft by 60 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.33 inHg
  • Observation at 10:56 am from KBZN, 18 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KBZN 101656Z 00000KT 10SM CLR 12/05 A3033 RMK AO2 SLP271 T01170050

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

3 documents, released by the NTSB on June 21, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.