The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR23LA321 · Final report

Cessna T210M accident near Napa, California, August 21, 2023

On August 21, 2023 at about 7:10 pm local time, a 1978 Cessna T210M, registered N6535B, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Napa, California (Napa County Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Insufficient hydraulic pressure to the landing gear system following the completion of the emergency gear extension checklist, which resulted in the main landing gear collapsing during landing. Contributing to the accident was a loss of electrical power for reasons that could not be determined based on available evidence, which resulted in a failure of the normal landing gear extension system.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 21, 2023 · about 7:10 pm local time
Place
Napa, California · Napa County Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna T210M, built 1978 · all T210Ms on the register
Registration
N6535B · no longer on the register · serial 21062783
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was flying the airplane to an airport where the annual inspection was to be performed. During climb out, the airplane sustained a total loss of electrical power. The pilot elected to return to the departure airport, and during the return, she was able to regain communication on one radio. The pilot followed the emergency landing gear extension checklist and attempted to manually apply hydraulic pressure to extend the landing gear. However, she could not verify that the landing gear was fully extended and locked due to the electrical failure. She reported that she pumped the manual handle up and down over 55 times (cycles) and felt the handle was stiff when she stopped pumping. The pilot flew a visual approach to land and, while on the base leg, tower personnel told her the gear appeared to be down. The pilot continued the approach, and during landing, both main landing gear collapsed, resulting in the airplane exiting the runway and striking a fence and brush. The owner of the airplane did not respond to investigator inquiries, and disposed of the airplane before an examination could be completed. As a result, the reason for the electrical failure that precipitated the landing gear collapse could not be determined. The Landing Gear Failure to Extend checklist directs the pilot to pump the emergency hand pump “until resistance becomes heavy - about 65 cycles,” and contains a note that indicated, “It takes about 55 cycles (110 strokes) to extend the gear.” The accident is consistent with the landing gear not extending normally following a loss of electrical power, and subsequently was not locked in the down position following completion of the emergency gear extension checklist. Although the pilot pumped the emergency gear extension handle the minimum recommended times, the pressure created was likely insufficient to ensure the landing gear were fully extended and locked in the down position, which resulted in the main landing gear collapsing during landing.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing gear collapse during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event
  2. Electrical system malf/failure during initial climb
  3. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Electrical power system › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Gear position and warning › Inoperative
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Main landing gear › Malfunction
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Attain/maintain not possible

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 417 hours in all; 1 in this make and model; 42 in the last 90 days; 36 in the last 30 days; 263 as pilot in command; 23 on instruments
  • Last flight review: May 10, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Pilot-Rated Passenger

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Maximum gross weight: 4,118 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Continental TSIO-520 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Destination: Modesto CA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 19R, 5,930 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 220° at 11 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds
  • Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 60°F (16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.96 inHg

Weather report (METAR): 11:53 AM 77 °F 60 °F 56 % SSW 13 mph 0 mph 29.96 in 0.0 in Mostly Cloudy

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on February 20, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.