The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR19FA095 · Final report

North American T28 and Cessna 152 accident near Compton, California, March 14, 2019

On March 14, 2019 at about 1:50 am local time, 2 aircraft, North American T28 (N5440F) and Cessna 152 (N48962), were involved in the same accident near Compton, California (Compton/Woodley airport). 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The failure of the T-28 pilot to see and avoid the Cessna while landing with reduced visibility due to sun glare, which resulted in a collision on the runway. Contributing to the accident was his failure to use the airport's common traffic advisory frequency during the approach and landing.
The failure of the T-28 pilot to see and avoid the Cessna while landing with reduced visibility due to sun glare, which resulted in a collision on the runway. Contributing to the accident was his failure to use the airport's common traffic advisory frequency during the approach and landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 14, 2019 · about 1:50 am local time
Place
Compton, California · Compton/Woodley · map
Type
Accident · collision on the ground
Injuries
1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured; 1 other was unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft 1
North American T28 B, built 1956 · all T28s on the register
Registration
N5440F · no longer on the register · serial 138294
Damage
Minor damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
Aircraft 2
Cessna 152 No Series, built 1977 · all 152s on the register
Registration
N48962 · no longer on the register · serial 15281075
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative for the North American T28 final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot and flight instructor in the Cessna were landing at the non-tower-controlled airport when a North American T-28 collided with the Cessna from behind, fatally injuring the student. Radar data indicated that the T-28 overflew the airport before joining the downwind leg of the traffic pattern for the landing runway; about this time, the Cessna was on final approach. The pilot of the T-28 reported that the bright sun and the haze created a glare on the windscreen that obscured his forward vision, making it difficult for him to see directly ahead, and the glare became worse as he descended toward the runway on final approach. The T-28 pilot saw the Cessna ahead of him on the runway just before the collision occurred. The instructor onboard the Cessna could not recall the details of the flight but reported that his student would have made radio calls on the airport's common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) as they approached the airport for landing. The CTAF was not recorded, and the radio frequency settings of the Cessna could not be determined due to thermal damage. Examination of the T-28 revealed that its radio was not tuned to the airport's CTAF; therefore, the T-28 pilot was neither receiving position reports from other aircraft in the traffic pattern, nor was he broadcasting his position. The circumstances of the accident are consistent with the T-28 pilot's failure to see and avoid the Cessna while landing with reduced visibility due to sun glare, and it is likely that his failure to monitor and use the CTAF contributed to the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The NTSB's narrative for the Cessna 152 final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot and flight instructor in the Cessna were landing at the non-tower-controlled airport when a North American T-28 collided with the Cessna from behind, fatally injuring the student. Radar data indicated that the T-28 overflew the airport before joining the downwind leg of the traffic pattern for the landing runway; about this time, the Cessna was on final approach. The pilot of the T-28 reported that the bright sun and the haze created a glare on the windscreen that obscured his forward vision, making it difficult for him to see directly ahead, and the glare became worse as he descended toward the runway on final approach. The T-28 pilot saw the Cessna ahead of him on the runway just before the collision occurred. The instructor onboard the Cessna could not recall the details of the flight but reported that his student would have made radio calls on the airport's common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) as they approached the airport for landing. The CTAF was not recorded, and the radio frequency settings of the Cessna could not be determined due to thermal damage. Examination of the T-28 revealed that its radio was not tuned to the airport's CTAF; therefore, the T-28 pilot was neither receiving position reports from other aircraft in the traffic pattern, nor was he broadcasting his position. The circumstances of the accident are consistent with the T-28 pilot's failure to see and avoid the Cessna while landing with reduced visibility due to sun glare, and it is likely that his failure to monitor and use the CTAF contributed to the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record for the North American T28 from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Runway incursion veh/AC/person during landing (landing roll) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring communications › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Bright light › Contributed to outcome
  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other aircraft › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Glare › Effect on personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot, flight engineer, military
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 24,000 hours in all; 400 in this make and model; 3 in the last 90 days; 1 in the last 30 days; 18,000 as pilot in command; 1,000 on instruments
  • Last flight review: March 15, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Maximum gross weight: 850 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Wright R-1820-86B (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: WHP Los Angeles CA at 1:30 am
  • Destination: CPM Compton CA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 25L, 3,322 ft by 60 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 270° at 11 knots, gusting 16
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 32°F (0°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.02 inHg
  • Observation at 1:53 am from KHHR, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

The factual record for the Cessna 152 from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Runway incursion veh/AC/person during landing (landing roll) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Pilot of other aircraft

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 9,542 hours in all; 1,674 in this make and model; 107 in the last 90 days; 55 in the last 30 days; 9,402 as pilot in command; 6,972 on instruments
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 22 hours in all; 22 in this make and model; 15 in the last 90 days; 5 in the last 30 days; 1 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 20,105 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, February 20, 2019; 68 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,675 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-235-L2C (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground
  • Operator: Long Beach Flying Club

The flight

  • Departed from: LGB Long Beach CA at 1:30 am
  • Destination: LGB Long Beach CA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 25L, 3,322 ft by 60 ft

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew11

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.