The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR09CA084 · Final report

Cessna U206E accident near Crane Island, San Juan Is., Washington, January 14, 2009

On January 14, 2009 at about 6:15 pm local time, a Cessna U206E, registered N9428G, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Crane Island, San Juan Is., Washington (Crane Island, San Juan Island airport). It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's improper application of brakes.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 14, 2009 · about 6:15 pm local time
Place
Crane Island, San Juan Is., Washington · Crane Island, San Juan Island · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna U206E · all U206Es on the register
Registration
N9428G · registry record · serial U20601628
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The operator's Director of Operations reported that the flight was dispatched from their home base to pickup a waiting passenger for a flight under their 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135 operating certificate. Upon arriving over the airstrip, the pilot made a traffic pattern approach and observed that the wind was calm. The pilot stated that his airspeed and approach path were approximately normal and that he was familiar with the airstrip, having landed there in a southerly direction on previous days. The airplane touched down near the beginning of the short, 1,350-foot-long grass runway. The pilot further reported that he used light to firm brake pressure and that the airplane began sliding. He stated that the south portion of the runway (near its departure end) was soggy. He attempted a rapid left turn to avoid encountering the drop-off adjacent to the runway's end. As the airplane turned left, the right wing dipped down, impacted the ground, and broke. The Cessna Aircraft Company's "Landing Distance Table" in the U206 operating handbook provides guidelines for ascertaining the approximate landing distance needed under various conditions. The performance data in the handbook indicated that on a dry grass runway, a distance of at least 897 feet is needed to stop the airplane. The table data does not provide distance information for a "soggy" wet grass runway.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll) defining event
  2. Abnormal runway contact during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Runway/land/takeoff/taxi surfa › Wet › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Operating environment › Airport facilities/design › Runway/landing area length › Effect on operation
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Brake › Incorrect use/operation
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 1,600 hours in all; 200 in this make and model; 124 in the last 90 days; 13 in the last 30 days; 1,324 as pilot in command; 470 on instruments
  • Last flight review: June 26, 2008
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 9,467 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, November 21, 2008; 26 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor IO-520-F (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Rugby Aviation LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: FHR Friday Harbor WA at 6:00 pm
  • Destination: None Crane Island WA
  • Runway 12, 1,350 ft by 60 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 6,000 ft
  • Temperature: 48°F (9°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.54 inHg
  • Observation at 6:00 pm from FHR, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N9428G the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2005-07-08SEA05LA141 · accident near Stuart Island, WA · substantial damage · no injuries
1997-10-09SEA98LA034 · accident near Friday Harbor, WA · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.