Textron Aviation INC 172S accident near Tuskegee, Alabama, October 27, 2022
On October 27, 2022 at about 8:09 pm local time, a 2018 Textron Aviation INC 172S, registered N858AU, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Tuskegee, Alabama (Moton Field). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The flight instructor’s improper flare, which resulted in a hard landing and subsequent runway excursion.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- October 27, 2022 · about 8:09 pm local time
- Place
- Tuskegee, Alabama · Moton Field · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Textron Aviation INC 172S, built 2018
- Registration
- N858AU · registry record · serial 172S12149
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The flight instructor was demonstrating a short-field landing to the pilot receiving instruction. The flight instructor reported that, during the landing attempt when the airplane was about 10 to 40 ft above ground level, the airplane’s airspeed decreased, and the sink rate increased. The flight instructor stated that he applied full throttle for a go-around; however, the engine did not respond and may have even further decreased before the airplane landed hard on the runway, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage. Review of data downloaded from the airplane’s primary flight display revealed that the airplane’s airspeed had decayed from around 50 knots to 25 knots during the landing flare and touchdown, while remaining relatively consistent at around 900 rpm. After touching down the engine power suddenly increased and reached a maximum of 1,800 rpm before then stopping completely about 7 seconds later. The data were not consistent with the flight instructor’s description that the engine power was lost or that the engine did not respond to the throttle inputs during the approach. Rather, the data suggested that the throttle application did not occur until after the airplane had contacted the runway. Following the hard landing, and subsequent runway excursion during which the nose landing gear collapsed, the engine did stop completely, and in his statement the flight instructor expressed surprise that, “…the engine was not producing any sound to indicate it was even running, nonetheless running at the appropriate rate given that the throttle was still set to maximum…” It is possible that this perception may have contributed to the instructor’s recollection of the engine not performing correctly during the accident sequence. Given this information, it is likely that the flight instructor’s improper flare resulted in a hard landing and subsequent runway excursion.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Instructor/check pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare › Not attained/maintained
Pilot
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 1,058 hours in all; 1,022 in this make and model; 115 in the last 90 days; 30 in the last 30 days; 978 as pilot in command; 646 on instruments
- Last flight review: October 26, 2021
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: minor injuries
Dual student
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Last flight review: July 27, 2022
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 2,197 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, September 15, 2022; 85 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 2,550 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming IO-360 (piston); 2,197 hours total
- Operator: Auburn University
The flight
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 13, 5,005 ft by 100 ft
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 070° at 5 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
- Altimeter: 30.06 inHg
- Observation at 3:56 pm from AUO, 16 miles away
Weather report (METAR): METAR KAUO 272056Z AUTO 07005KT 10SM CLR 23/13 A3006
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
5 documents, released by the NTSB on June 5, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 15 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Memorandum for the Record - FAA Inspector | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 3 | FAA Inspector's Statement | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 4 | Photo | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 5 | Garmin PFD Data | data file | Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
