Northwing Design APACHE SPORT accident near Southern Shores, North Carolina, September 21, 2022
On September 21, 2022 at about 2:00 pm local time, a 2005 Northwing Design APACHE SPORT (weight-shift aircraft), registered N3283N, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Southern Shores, North Carolina. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed and 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
A loss of aircraft control due to movement of the outer portion of the right wing fabric and displacement of wing ribs for reasons that could not be determined based on the available information.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- September 21, 2022 · about 2:00 pm local time
- Place
- Southern Shores, North Carolina · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed and 1 person had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Northwing Design APACHE SPORT NO SERIES, built 2005
- Registration
- N3283N · registry record · serial 6199
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot and passenger were in cruise flight about 3,500 ft mean sea level (msl) flying offshore between 55 and 60 mph in the weight-shift-control (WSC) aircraft. The passenger reported that the pilot informed him that the flight might encounter turbulence, then about 5 minutes later, it felt like, “something punched the plane,” consistent with turbulence. The passenger reported that he then noted 8 of the right wing ribs were extending 3 to 4 inches aft of the aft edge of the wing sail, and the fabric of the right side of the wing was no longer stretched and the right wing area was much smaller than the left wing. He then felt an upward jar, and the aircraft entered a right descending turn that the pilot attempted to control. When “very close to the ocean,” he felt a force consistent with activation of the airframe parachute. After water impact, he struggled but managed to release his restraint and remained in the water about 30 minutes before being rescued. Examination of the wing, which washed ashore several months after the accident, revealed that the outer portion of the sail fabric on the right side of the wing had moved inboard along the leading edge tube and bunched at the juncture of the leading edge tube and wing strut. The inspection did not determine the condition of the ribs on the right side of the wing. The resulting fabric movement, combined with the passenger-reported displacement of multiple wing ribs, likely changed the airfoil shape and lift properties of the right side of the wing, resulting in the right descending turn described by the passenger. Although there was no structural failure of the right wing, it could not be determined why the sail moved inboard along the leading edge tube or what ribs were remaining with the wing and the rib positions among the sail. While the passenger reported experiencing turbulence immediately before the observed wing issue, the available weather data did not support conditions conducive to turbulence, and no cumulus clouds were visible on satellite images or in the dataset around the accident time. Additionally, the passenger’s description of the airframe parachute activation occurring “very close” to the surface of the water suggested that it may not have been activated with sufficient time to fully realize the benefits of such a system.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
- Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during enroute (cruise) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 353 hours in all; 29.7 in this make and model; 14.7 in the last 90 days; 6 in the last 30 days
- Last flight review: September 7, 2021
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: frt
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 460 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, July 23, 2022; 14.7 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 1,060 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Rotax 582 (piston); 521 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: FFA Kill Devil Hills NC at 12:45 pm
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 040° at 5 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
- Altimeter: 30.01 inHg
- Observation at 9:55 am from KFFA, 6 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KFFA 211355Z AUTO 04005KT 10SM CLR 26/18 A3001 RMK AO2 T02550181
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
15 documents, released by the NTSB on July 10, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
