Cessna 402C accident near Hyannis, Massachusetts, April 26, 2021
On April 26, 2021 at about 7:26 pm local time, a 1979 Cessna 402C, registered N2714B, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR go-around) near Hyannis, Massachusetts (Cape Cod Gateway airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The flight instructor’s failure to confirm the position of the left engine’s auxiliary fuel boost pump switch during a simulated engine out procedure, which resulted in an excess amount of fuel in the engine and subsequent partial loss of power during a go-around/rejected landing. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor’s failure to maintain control of the airplane, which resulted in a hard landing.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- April 26, 2021 · about 7:26 pm local time
- Place
- Hyannis, Massachusetts · Cape Cod Gateway · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 402C, built 1979 · all 402Cs on the register
- Registration
- N2714B · no longer on the register · serial 402C0210
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
A flight instructor and a new-hire trainee pilot were practicing instrument approach procedures in the multi-engine airplane. The first approach was a circle-to-land that terminated with a go-around/rejected landing. On climb out, the flight instructor reduced power on the left engine to simulate an engine failure on takeoff. The pilot then ran the memory items for an engine failure, which included turning the left engine auxiliary fuel boost pump to high. Air traffic control then vectored the airplane for another instrument approach. The approach terminated with the pilot making visual contact with the runway and preparing to land. When the airplane was about 50 ft above the runway, the flight instructor called for a two-engine go-around. The pilot brought both throttles to full power and retracted the flaps and gear. The flight instructor said the airplane yawed left, and the airspeed was about 80 knots, well under the airplane’s best single engine rate of climb speed of 95 knots. The flight instructor took control of the airplane and called for the gear to be extended. He told the pilot that he was going to land on the grass. The airplane landed hard and rolled before the nose and left main landing gear collapsed, resulting in substantial damage to the left engine and wing. Prior to exiting the airplane, the pilot said he turned the left engine auxiliary boost pump from the high position to the off position. The flight instructor said that turning the boost pump to high while the engine was still operating could flood the engine with excess fuel and cause it to lose power. He said that he normally reminds pilots not to turn the pump to high during a simulated engine failure in flight, but neither he nor the pilot recalled it being mentioned during the accident flight. Postaccident examination of the left engine revealed no mechanical discrepancies that would have precluded normal operation. As a result, its most likely that when the boost pump was turned to high, it flooded the engine with excess fuel, resulting in loss of engine power while attempting to go around. The flight instructor and the pilot were not prepared for the loss of engine power and the airspeed dropped well below the airplane’s best single engine rate of climb speed of 95 knots. Due to the low airspeed and altitude, the flight instructor took control of the airplane and landed on the grass adjacent to the runway. The pilot said that he had practiced simulated engine out procedures in the simulator, but never in the airplane. In the simulator, he was taught to physically move the auxiliary boost pump to the high position when practicing a simulated engine failure. He was not aware that turning the auxiliary fuel boost pump to high could result in a loss of engine power.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown)
- Fuel related during approach (VFR go-around)
- Loss of engine power (partial) during approach (VFR go-around) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel) › Issuing instructions › Instructor/check pilot
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Instructor/check pilot
- Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other person › Instructor/check pilot
Flight instructor
- Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot, private
- Ratings: multi-engine land; multi-engine sea; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 20,000 hours in all; 10,500 in this make and model; 86 in the last 90 days; 56 in the last 30 days; 19,900 as pilot in command; 4,000 on instruments
- Last flight review: December 4, 2020
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
Pilot
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 1,538 hours in all; 5 in this make and model; 5 in the last 90 days; 5 in the last 30 days; 1,388 as pilot in command; 1,246 on instruments
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 38,774.8 hours
- Last inspection: approved inspection programme, April 12, 2021
- Maximum gross weight: 7,200 lb
- Seats: 10
- Landing gear: retractable
- Operator: Hyannis Air Service
The flight
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 06/2, 5,425 ft by 150 ft
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 360° at 11 knots, gusting 18
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 32°F (0°C)
- Altimeter: 29.81 inHg
- Observation at 3:47 pm from HYA
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
7 documents, released by the NTSB on August 19, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | NTSB Record of Conversation - Training Captain | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 3 | NTSB Record of Conversation - Trainee | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 4 | FAA Inspector's Engine Examination Report | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 5 | Survellance Video File - Approach | AVI file | Download |
| 6 | Surveillance Video File - Approach 2 | AVI file | Download |
| 7 | Photos | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
