Hawker Beechcraft CORP G36 accident near West Caldwell, New Jersey, January 21, 2017
On January 21, 2017 at about 5:45 pm local time, a 2012 Hawker Beechcraft CORP G36, registered N979BA, was destroyed in an accident during initial climb near West Caldwell, New Jersey (Essex County airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s failure to maintain airplane control after takeoff, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- January 21, 2017 · about 5:45 pm local time
- Place
- West Caldwell, New Jersey · Essex County · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was seriously injured.
- Weather
- instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
- Aircraft
- Hawker Beechcraft CORP G36 NO SERIES, built 2012
- Registration
- N979BA · no longer on the register · serial E-3979
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot filed an instrument flight rules flight plan and departed from the airport. After takeoff, air traffic controllers observed the airplane “barely climbing,” in a left turn, and leveling off well below the pilot’s assigned altitude of 3,000 ft mean sea level. The cloud ceiling was at 900 ft above ground level (agl) at the time, and the pilot did not enter instrument meteorological conditions after taking off. The airplane only reached about 400 ft agl before it began to descend. The airplane then struck the roof of a warehouse with its left wing, impacted terrain in a nose-low attitude while rotating to the left, and contacted the ground about 0.5 miles from the departure end of the runway. A fire then erupted. The pilot was seriously injured and the airplane was destroyed. Following the accident, the pilot stated to police officers that during his climbout, the airplane would no longer gain altitude, “wouldn’t pull up,” and began to lose altitude. He stated that he had no warning lights or audible alerts, that the engine was running normally, and that he was attempting to return to the airport. He did not provide any additional statements or other information about the flight. An annual inspection of the airplane had been completed 5 days before the accident with no unresolved discrepancies noted. Postaccident examination and testing did not reveal evidence of any preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions of the airplane or engine that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the wreckage and security camera video revealed that the flaps were up and the landing gear had not been retracted after a positive rate of climb was established after rotation. The airplane would have had trouble accelerating with the landing gear in the down position, which may have degraded its ability to climb normally. The airplane was equipped with a stall warning horn that would sound as the airplane approached an aerodynamic stall. Review of recorded air traffic control audio transmissions from the airplane revealed the presence of the stall warning horn during the pilot’s transmissions for about 13 seconds before impact. This indicated that the pilot likely did not recognize the impending stall and did not reduce the angle of attack immediately to retain or regain control of the airplane, which allowed the airplane to approach and then exceed the critical angle of attack and resulted in the airplane entering an uncontrolled descent.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during initial climb defining event
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Capability exceeded
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 1,430 hours in all; 231 in this make and model; 1,390 as pilot in command
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: serious injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 251.9 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, January 16, 2017
- Maximum gross weight: 3,650 lb
- Seats: 6
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Cont Motor IO-550-B (piston); 252 hours total
- Fire on the ground
The flight
- Departed from: CDW West Caldwell NJ at 5:45 pm
- Destination: HPN White Plains NY
- Flight plan: IFR
- Runway 22, 4,552 ft by 80 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 180° at 5 knots
- Visibility: 9 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 900 ft
- Temperature: 46°F (8°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
- Altimeter: 29.81 inHg
- Observation at 5:50 pm from CDW, 1 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
19 documents, released by the NTSB on May 6, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
