The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CHI07CA296 · Final report

Cessna 172 Skyhawk accident near Stockton, Missouri, September 11, 2007

On September 11, 2007 at about 4:05 pm local time, a Cessna 172 Skyhawk, registered N12189, was substantially damaged in an accident near Stockton, Missouri (Stockton Muni airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing, her subsequent loss of control of the airplane, and the inadvertent stall.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 11, 2007 · about 4:05 pm local time
Place
Stockton, Missouri · Stockton Muni · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 Skyhawk · all 172 Skyhawks on the register
Registration
N12189 · registry record · serial 17260872
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airplane impacted terrain following a bounced landing on runway 1 (3,060 feet by 50 feet, asphalt) and subsequent stall. The student pilot was on a solo flight when the accident occurred. She reported that the landing touchdown was hard and the airplane bounced back into the air. She added engine power in an attempt to go-around; however, the airplane veered to the left, off of the runway centerline. Her efforts to regain control of the airplane were unsuccessful. The airport manager stated that he noticed the accident airplane on approach for landing. He noted the pilot appeared to be having difficulty lining up with the runway due to an east crosswind at about 10 knots, with higher gusts. Upon touchdown, the airplane "bounced high into the air" in an approximate 45-degree left bank. After a heading change of approximately 30 degrees to the left, the airplane appeared to stall and subsequently impacted the ground.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 56 hours in all; 55 in this make and model; 14 in the last 90 days; 5 in the last 30 days; 13 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: August 1, 2007
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,400 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, September 1, 2007
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320-E2D (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: PTS Pittsburg KS at 3:01 pm
  • Destination: MO3 Stockton MO
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 1, 3,060 ft by 50 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 350° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 52°F (11°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.17 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.