The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN25LA188 · Final report

Piper PA-18 accident near Vega, Texas, May 26, 2025

On May 26, 2025 at about 8:40 pm local time, a 1957 Piper PA-18, registered N7175D, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Vega, Texas (Oldham County airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The airplane’s inadvertent encounter with a localized low boundary layer, which caused a wind shift, and a gusting tailwind during final approach, that resulted in the pilot deciding to impact a wind cone and a subsequent impact with terrain. Contributing was the low-level convective turbulence.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 26, 2025 · about 8:40 pm local time
Place
Vega, Texas · Oldham County · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-18 NO SERIES, built 1957 · all PA-18s on the register
Registration
N7175D · registry record · serial 18-5634
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported the airplane departed from the airport with a passenger onboard for a local area flight. The pilot maneuvered the airplane for landing on a grass strip, that parallels the asphalt runway. As the airplane descended and turned from base to final, the airplane encountered a “pocket of unstable air” and a “heavy gust” that pushed the right wing up and caused the airplane to rapidly descend. The pilot applied right aileron and full power. The pilot was able to level the airplane; however, it continued to descend. Due to the location of the airplane at the time, the pilot decided to impact the lighted wind cone (a L-807 structure, size 2, located inside of a segmented circle) with the airplane, as opposed to performing an aggressive turn and the right wing impacting the ground. The airplane impacted the wind cone, the wind cone structure collapsed, and the windsock separated from the structure. The airplane came to rest upright on the grass strip. The pilot and the passenger were able to egress from the airplane without further incident. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, the right wing, and the right wing strut. The pilot reported there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airframe or the engine that would have precluded normal operation. A weather study showed that at the time of the accident, a line of cumulus clouds along a convergence zone had passed with a wind shift to the north. This convergence zone likely amplified the turbulence in the low-level boundary layer and resulted in localized gusty winds and convective turbulence. A review of available weather information revealed that the wind shift was not forecasted.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Attempted remediation/recovery during approach (VFR pattern final)
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event
  3. Evacuation during post (impact)
  4. Collision during takeoff/land during landing
  5. Other weather encounter during approach (VFR pattern final)
  6. Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR pattern final)

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Knowledge › Knowledge of meteorologic cond › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › (general) › (general) › Ability to respond/compensate
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › (general) › (general) › Contributed to outcome
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › (general) › (general) › Awareness of condition
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › (general) › (general) › Effect on equipment
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 1,780 hours in all; 440 in this make and model; 40 in the last 90 days; 16 in the last 30 days; 1,780 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: December 17, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,052 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 15, 2024; 8 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,400 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental Motors C90 (piston); 480 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 17/3, 4,200 ft by 60 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 140° at 11 knots, gusting 15
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.03 inHg
  • Observation at 3:35 pm from KHRX, 23 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KHRX 262035Z AUTO 14011G15KT 10SM CLR 25/13 A3003 RMK AO2 T02460133 TSNO

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Photographs from the investigation 8 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on July 17, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.