The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN15LA329 · Final report

Amateur-built AEROMASTER accident near Sulphur Springs, Texas, July 31, 2015

On July 31, 2015, a amateur-built AEROMASTER, registered N55J, was destroyed in an accident during initial climb near Sulphur Springs, Texas (Sulphur Springs Municipal Airp airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined because postimpact damage precluded a thorough examination of the airplane. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's failure to maintain control following the loss of engine power, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle of attack and experiencing an aerodynamic stall/spin.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 31, 2015
Place
Sulphur Springs, Texas · Sulphur Springs Municipal Airp · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built AEROMASTER
Registration
N55J · no longer on the register · serial REO-2
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot had purchased the experimental amateur-built airplane about 2 weeks before the accident. The previous owner had provided the pilot with a 1-hour familiarization flight, during which he repeatedly told the pilot not to lean the mixture control on takeoff. During takeoff on the familiarization flight, the pilot leaned the mixture, resulting in a total loss of engine power while still on the runway. After advancing the mixture control, the engine restarted and they continued the flight. The pilot again leaned the mixture control at altitude, which resulted in the engine running rough. Following the familiarization flight, the pilot departed to an unknown destination, and, during that flight, he landed at an en route airport due to a rough-running engine. Maintenance personnel at the airport found that the airplane had 26 mechanical discrepancies and was unairworthy. Two mechanics and two experimental aircraft builders told the pilot that the airplane was unsafe and should be taken apart and "trailered" home. The mechanic repaired a leaking brake, replaced all of the spark plugs, serviced the oil, and ran the engine. During the postmaintenance engine run, the magnetos were checked and appeared to function properly, and the engine ran smoothly. The pilot then departed on the accident flight. The mechanic stated that the airplane experienced a total loss of engine power about 200 ft above ground level and the airplane entered a left turn, which subsequently developed into a stall/spin. The airplane completed about 1/4 turn in the spin before impacting terrain. Postaccident examination was precluded by damage sustained in the postcrash fire. The investigation was unable to determine if the loss of engine power occurred due to the pilot's improper manipulation of the engine controls, or if there was a mechanical malfunction.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aircraft maintenance event during prior to flight
  2. Loss of engine power (total) during initial climb
  3. Loss of control in flight during initial climb defining event
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Pitch control › Not attained/maintained
  • Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › (general) › Not inspected
  • Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › (general) › Not serviced/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 151 hours in all; 2 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 1
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental E185 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: SLR Sulphur Springs TX
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 1, 5,001 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 060° at 9 knots, gusting 16
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 8,000 ft
  • Temperature: 90°F (32°C), dew point 70°F (21°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.