Beech B24R accident near Skull Valley, Utah, February 10, 2025
On February 10, 2025 at about 9:55 pm local time, a 1975 Beech B24R, registered N9324S, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Skull Valley, Utah. It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The flight instructor’s improper fuel management, which resulted in fuel starvation and a total loss of engine power. Contributing to the accident were multiple distractions that diverted the flight instructor’s attention from the proper monitoring and management of the fuel load.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- February 10, 2025 · about 9:55 pm local time · cases in 2025
- Place
- Skull Valley, Utah · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Beech B24R, built 1975 · all B24Rs on the register
- Registration
- N9324S · registry record · serial MC-345
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The flight instructor and student pilot departed the airport for the student pilot’s first flight lesson, which was also the flight instructor’s first flight in the accident airplane make and model. The flight instructor stated that the airplane was fully fueled, and the fuel selector valve was initially set in the right tank position. After about 1 hour 44 minutes, the airplane’s engine lost all power. During the approximate 4-minute descent, the flight instructor’s efforts to restart the engine were unsuccessful, and he executed a forced landing at an off-airport site. During the landing rollout, the airplane impacted vegetation and terrain, sustaining substantial damage to the fuselage and empennage. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the right fuel tank had been exhausted of all usable fuel, while the left fuel tank was nearly full of fuel. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. A test run of the engine after the accident revealed normal operations from idle to full speed. Although the flight instructor reported that he repositioned the fuel selector valve handle multiple times during the flight, the fuel evidence in the wreckage was consistent with the right fuel tank having been selected for most or all the flight. Given that the flight instructor was unfamiliar with the airplane make and model and encountered a communications anomaly and the student pilot’s motion sickness during the flight, it is likely that he was distracted by these multiple events such that he failed to adequately monitor the fuel tank quantities. This allowed for the consumption of all usable fuel in the right-wing tank and resulted in the loss of engine power.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Fuel starvation during enroute (cruise) defining event
- Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot
- Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management other cases naming the fuel system
- Environmental issues › Physical environment › Terrain › Rough terrain › Contributed to outcome
- Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Pilot
- Environmental issues › Operating environment › (general) › (general) › Effect on personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
- Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 300 hours in all; 2 in this make and model; 54 in the last 90 days; 32 in the last 30 days; 256 as pilot in command; 26 on instruments
- Last flight review: December 19, 2024
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
Dual student
- Certificate: student
- Flight time: 2 hours in all; 2 in this make and model; 2 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Last inspection: annual inspection, February 8, 2025
- Maximum gross weight: 2,750 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Lycoming IO-360-A1B6 (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: SPK Spanish Fork UT at 8:09 pm
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 320° at 9 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 36°F (2°C), dew point 10°F (-12°C)
- Altimeter: 30.05 inHg
- Observation at 2:55 pm from KU42, 32 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KU42 102155Z AUTO 32009KT 10SM CLR 02/M12 A3005 RMK AO1 T00221116
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 |
Photographs from the investigation 6 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them
Photograph 1 – N9324S at the accident site, left-side view.
Photograph 2 – N9324S right-side view.
Photograph 3 – Right-wing fuel tank.
Photograph 4 – Left-wing fuel tank.
Photograph 5 – Fuel tank selector valve, shown in left tank position.
Photograph 6 – N9324S during engine test run.The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
10 documents, released by the NTSB on September 30, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 10 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Pilot's Statement | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Interviews | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 4 | ADS-B Kml Data | map file | Download |
| 5 | Pilot's Operating Handbook Excerpts WPR25FA090 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Airframe and Engine Examination Report for WPR25FA090 | PDF, 27 pages | View Download |
| 7 | ADS-B Excel Data | spreadsheet | Download |
| 8 | Photos | PDF, 8 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 9 | Party Member Certificates | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 10 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Connections how this case links to the rest of the register
- N9324S on the register today · the tail number may have moved to another aircraft since
- Beechcraft B24 117 registered today · the model family and its accident history
- Beechcraft 6 aircraft on the register
- Engine: Lycoming IO-360-A1B6 141 aircraft carry this series today · as the NTSB recorded it
- Spanish Fork Muni/Woodhouse Field · departed from
- Accidents and incidents in Utah 1,440 since 1982 · 264 in the last ten years
- Utah 8,356 aircraft registered
The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/WPR25FA090.json.
The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
