Air Tractor INC AT 602 accident near Willows, California, December 27, 2016
On December 27, 2016 at about 11:53 pm local time, a 1999 Air Tractor INC AT 602, registered N602L, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Willows, California (Willows-Glenn County airport). It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The decision of the maintenance facility mechanic to conduct maintenance without reference to the applicable manufacturer’s guidance, which resulted in the improper reassembly and subsequent failure of the engine compressor bleed valve, which in turn prevented the engine from responding to further power demand at a critical phase of flight. Contributing to the accident was the failure of the maintenance facility’s director of maintenance to ensure that the overhaul was conducted properly and that the required post-maintenance test procedures were accomplished.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- December 27, 2016 · about 11:53 pm local time
- Place
- Willows, California · Willows-Glenn County · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Air Tractor INC AT 602 NO SERIES, built 1999 · all AT 602s on the register
- Registration
- N602L · registry record · serial 602-0526
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The commercial pilot of the turboprop-equipped airplane departed from the maintenance facility airport following the completion of a 100-hour inspection, which included a compressor bleed valve overhaul. He did not perform an engine run-up or a postmaintenance performance check as recommended by the engine manufacturer but noticed that the engine was "sluggish" during takeoff. Near the conclusion of the 25-minute flight, the pilot initiated a straight-in approach to his destination airport and slightly reduced engine power. Immediately, he heard a "pop" noise and observed a reduction in airspeed. When the pilot advanced the throttle to full power, the engine power and airspeed did not change, and the airplane began to sink. The pilot conducted an off-airport forced landing and the airplane nosed over and came to rest inverted. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed that the valve seat had not been installed on the overhauled compressor bleed valve. The maintenance manual overhaul procedure requires that the bleed valve seat remain with the engine, which requires that the seat be removed from the old core unit and installed on the replacement or overhauled bleed valve before installing that component on the engine. At the time of the inspection, the inspection facility's director of maintenance encountered trouble retrieving the maintenance manual for this model engine from the manufacturer's website and decided to continue the service under the assumption that the bleed valve replacement was similar to another engine model with which he was familiar. The inspection facility submitted the core unit without removing the bleed valve seat, and the valve overhaul facility did not install any seat on the overhauled bleed valve, which was in compliance with the overhaul procedure. The inspection facility then installed the overhauled unit on the engine without the necessary valve seat. Additionally, the inspection facility failed to complete the bleed valve closing check procedure required by the engine manufacturer, which likely would have revealed a malfunctioning bleed valve. Further, the inspection facility reported that they performed an engine run up after completing maintenance, but contrary to required procedures did not record any power settings. Without the power setting data, the investigation was unable to positively determine whether the bleed valve closed properly during the ground test. Additionally, neither the maintenance facility nor the pilot completed the engine manufacturer's recommended engine performance check after the service was completed. The airplane was sluggish during takeoff because the engine was not able to achieve full power due to the absence of the bleed valve seat and consequent malfunctioning of the bleed valve. The "pop" sound heard by the pilot when he attempted to increase power during his approach was likely a compressor stall caused by the malfunctioning bleed valve. The malfunctioning bleed valve would have prevented the engine from responding to any additional power demand at this critical moment, and once the engine failed to respond, the pilot likely determined that the airplane would not reach the runway and completed a forced off-airport landing.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail during approach (VFR pattern final)
- Loss of engine power (partial) during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event
- Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
- Nose over/nose down during landing (flare/touchdown)
The NTSB's findings
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine bleed air system › Compressor bleed valve › Incorrect service/maintenance
- cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Maintenance personnel
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Installation › Maintenance personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: commercial pilot
- Ratings: single-engine land; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 4,147 hours in all; 2,085 in this make and model; 35 in the last 90 days; 16 in the last 30 days; 4,055 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: February 1, 2016
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: sngl
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 6,537 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, December 26, 2016; 0 hours since
- Seats: 1
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Pratt & Whitney PT6A-65ag (turboprop); 6,537 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: 69CL Davis CA at 11:27 pm
- Destination: WLW Willows CA
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 31, 3,788 ft by 60 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 52°F (11°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
- Altimeter: 30.31 inHg
- Observation at 11:53 pm from OVE, 27 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
9 documents, released by the NTSB on June 14, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Weather Reports and Records | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 3 | Record of Conversations | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Prime Turbines Component Inspection Record | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 5 | NTSB Engine Examination Report | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 6 | NTSB Airplane Examination Report | PDF, 12 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 8 | ICAO Foreign Notification | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 9 | Accident Photographs | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
