Aerospatiale AS350 accident near Starbuck, Washington, October 28, 2016
On October 28, 2016 at about 7:40 pm local time, a 1983 Aerospatiale AS350 (helicopter), registered N369BD, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Starbuck, Washington (Little Goose Lock And Dam airport). It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
A total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion, which resulted from the pilot’s reliance on the fuel gauge that was displaying an incorrect fuel amount due to the separation of the fuel transmitter float pin guide from the float.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- October 28, 2016 · about 7:40 pm local time
- Place
- Starbuck, Washington · Little Goose Lock And Dam · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Aerospatiale AS350 BA, built 1983 · all AS350s on the register
- Registration
- N369BD · no longer on the register · serial 1675
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The commercial pilot reported that, during the agricultural application flight in the helicopter, the fuel pressure warning light illuminated. The pilot scanned the instruments and noted that the fuel pressure was low and that the fuel quantity was indicating between 40% and 50%. Subsequently, the engine started to lose power. The pilot entered an autorotation and set up the helicopter for landing in the flattest area. Subsequently, the helicopter landed hard, which resulted in substantial damage to the tailboom and main rotor assembly. Postaccident examination of the helicopter revealed that the fuel tank was intact, undamaged, and empty of fuel. Given this evidence, the engine likely lost all power due to fuel exhaustion. Despite the lack of fuel, the fuel quantity gauge indicated that 42% of the fuel was remaining (or about 60 gallons). Disassembly of the fuel transmitter revealed that the float guide pin was separated from the float assembly at the tack weld. The separation of the float guide pin allowed the float to slide down the center torque shaft and prevented the potentiometer drive plate at the bottom from rotating when the fuel quantity changed, which led to the fuel quantity gauge displaying an incorrect fuel level. A review of the airplane's maintenance records revealed that the fuel transmitter was overhauled about 11 months before the accident. Given the evidence, it is likely that, during the overhaul, maintenance personnel improperly welded the float pin guide to its mount and subsequently did not adequately inspect it, which led to its eventual separation from the assembly at the welded area.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Miscellaneous/other during maneuvering (low-alt flying)
- Fuel exhaustion during maneuvering (low-alt flying)
- Loss of engine power (total) during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
- Off-field or emergency landing during landing
- Hard landing during landing
The NTSB's findings
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel quantity sensor › Failure
- cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level
- factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Repair › Maintenance personnel
- factor Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel quantity sensor › Incorrect service/maintenance
Pilot
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
- Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 4,529 hours in all; 862 in this make and model; 320 in the last 90 days; 128 in the last 30 days; 4,441 as pilot in command; 20 on instruments
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 14,004.8 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, October 27, 2016; 1.6 hours since
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Honeywell LTS101700D2 (turboshaft); 11,676 hours total
- Operator: Leading Edge Aviation LLC
The flight
- Departed from: Starbuck WA at 11:37 am
- Destination: Starbuck WA
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 330° at 6 knots
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 61°F (16°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
- Altimeter: 29.98 inHg
- Observation at 7:53 pm from KALW, 30 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
3 documents, released by the NTSB on January 15, 2020. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Pilot Statement | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Fuel Transmitter Examination Email | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
