The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA18CA502 · Final report

Wsk Pzl Mielec M-18A accident near Dansville, New York, August 4, 2018

On August 4, 2018 at about 6:00 pm local time, a Wsk Pzl Mielec M-18A, registered N851EJ, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Dansville, New York. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to maintain clearance from crops during an agricultural application flight.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 4, 2018 · about 6:00 pm local time · cases in 2018
Place
Dansville, New York · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Wsk Pzl Mielec M-18A
Registration
N851EJ · registry record · serial 1Z017-24
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he was performing an agricultural application flight to a corn field, which had a tree line running west to east on the north side of the field and another tree line running north to south on the east end of the field. He was making application passes from east to west and started at the south side of the field progressing northward toward the tree line with each pass. He added that he noticed that the wind speed increased to about 10 to 12 mph. During the second to last spray pass, while heading west, he came over the east end tree line and descended close to the corn. About 300 ft into the field, the airplane began to descend rapidly, and he pitched the airplane's nose up. He added that the descent continued and that the airplane began to lose airspeed. The landing gear struck the corn, and the airplane impacted terrain and came to rest inverted. The pilot added that he believed a combination of descending air that rolled over the north line of trees, wind shear, the low-altitude flying, and reduced margin of error for the proper application of pesticide caused the accident. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the empennage. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. A weather station, located about 3 miles northeast of the accident site reported, about the time of the accident, temperature 85.3°F, dew point 68.3°F, and wind from 293° at 6 mph, gusting to 8 mph.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Low altitude operation/event during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › (general) › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tree(s) › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,396 hours in all; 28.3 in this make and model; 101.9 in the last 90 days; 65.8 in the last 30 days; 1,339 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 23, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,795.1 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, July 7, 2018
  • Maximum gross weight: 10,340 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Wsk-Pzl ASZ-62IR-M18 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Jersey Devil Dusters LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: HTF Hornell NY at 5:45 pm
  • Destination: HTF Hornell NY
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 240° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 4,900 ft
  • Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.10 inHg
  • Observation at 5:54 pm from KDSV, 18 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Photographs from the investigation 2 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

4 documents, released by the NTSB on November 19, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/GAA18CA502.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.