The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA26FA027 · Preliminary: the investigation is not finished

Mooney M20E accident near Ballston Spa, New York, October 31, 2025

On October 31, 2025 at about 2:35 pm local time, a 1964 Mooney M20E, registered N79338, was destroyed in an accident during takeoff near Ballston Spa, New York (Saratoga County airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this accident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 31, 2025 · about 2:35 pm local time
Place
Ballston Spa, New York · Saratoga County · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Mooney M20E, built 1964 · all M20Es on the register
Registration
N79338 · registry record · serial 548
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record

On October 31, 2025, about 1035 eastern daylight time, a Mooney M20E, N79338, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Ballston Spa, New York. The pilot was fatally injured, and the flight instructor was seriously injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to the flight instructor, the pilot had just purchased the airplane and he was going to fly with the pilot to Punta Gorda, Florida, where the pilot lived. The insurance company required the pilot to fly with a flight instructor due to the pilot’s lack of experience in the airplane make and model. The flight instructor stated that he met the pilot for the first time the night before the accident, and they discussed the airplane’s maintenance issues and planned flight route. The flight instructor added that the pilot had test flown the airplane about 1 month prior to the accident flight. He also stated that the airplane’s engine lost power during the pilot’s test flight and that he had landed safely back at the airport at he end of that flight. The flight instructor described that the airplane’s fuel had been contaminated with algae and debris. A local mechanic subsequently repaired the fuel tank and cleaned out the fuel system. On the day of the accident flight, the flight instructor and pilot performed a preflight inspection of the airplane and sampled fuel from the fuel tanks several times before departing. The flight instructor stated that after takeoff and during the initial climb, about 200 ft above ground level, the engine decreased in power from 2,500 rpm to about 1,500 rpm. A few seconds later the engine decreased to about 500 rpm and then lost all power. The flight instructor took over control of the airplane and tried to make a turn back to the airport. When he made a right turn, he realized that the airplane was too low. He then made a slight left turn to avoid a house before the airplane impacted a tree. The accident site was located in a subdivision beside a house. The airplane impacted a tree about 20 ft up, fell to the ground, and came to rest oriented on heading of 232° magnetic. The engine was fractured off its mounts and lying beside the fuselage. The propeller was still attached to the engine and did not display s-bending, leading edge gouging, or chordwise scratching. All major components of the airplane were located at the accident site. A postimpact fire consumed portions of the engine, instrument panel and cockpit. No useful information was obtained from the remaining instrumentation. The right wing root was still attached to the fuselage and about 6 ft of the outboard portion of the wing was located in a tree directly above the main wreckage. The aileron was still attached to the outboard portion of the wing. The right flap remained attached to the wing. The flaps were in the full retracted position. The left wing also remained attached to the fuselage. The wing was consumed by fire, and the left fuel tank was destroyed. The flap was attached to the wing. About 3 ft of the outboard portion of the left wing fractured off the wing and was located about 20 ft from the main wreckage. The left wing had several tree impressions down the leading edge. The cockpit, instrument panel, and engine bay were destroyed by fire. No useful information was obtained. The tail section was attached to the empennage. The left stabilator and elevator were bent up mid-span. The rudder and right elevator were unremarkable. The airplane was further examined after it was recovered from the accident site. Flight control continuity was visually established through torque tubes and fracture surfaces consistent with impact damage. The fuel system from the pickup tubes to the engine fuel injectors was clear of debris and air was passed through all lines and valves. The system exhibited no blockages or other abnormalities. The engine rocker box covers, engine driven fuel pump, magnetos, and the remnants of the airframe baffling were removed. The crankshaft was rotated by applying hand pressure to the propeller, and after the start ring gear and propeller collar were removed, full 360° rotation of the crankshaft was achieved. Compression and suction were observed on all four cylinders, normal valve action was observed on all cylinders, the accessory idler gears were observed rotating, and mechanical continuity was confirmed throughout. The cylinders were examined with a boroscope. Oil pooling was observed in the No. 2 and No. 4 cylinders, and all cylinders were clean with very little deposits on the piston faces or combustion domes. The induction plenum was inspected via borescope and no blockage or obstructions were observed. All four induction tubes remained attached to the engine with various levels of impact-related damage. The exhaust system remained secure to the engine and was partially crushed from impact forces. It was inspected via borescope and no blockage was observed. The fuel flow divider remained secure to the crankcase spine. All four fuel injection lines remained secure to the flow divider, and to their respective fuel injection nozzles. The fuel inlet line remained secure to the flow divider. The flow divider and lines were removed and the flow divider was disassembled. The diaphragm was brittle and destroyed consistent with exposure to extreme heat, and no blockage was observed in the flow divider. Air was blown through the inlet fitting and was observed coming out of all four injection nozzle lines. All four fuel injection nozzles were removed and oil was present in the No. 2 and No. 4 nozzles (oil likely from the orientation of the engine after the accident). The oil was blown out and no contamination was observed in any of the fuel injection nozzles. All four of the nozzles had the restrictor inserts installed. Air was blown through the flow divider inlet fuel line and fuel flow transducer, no obstructions observed. The engine-driven fuel pump remained attached to the engine accessory housing with the fuel inlet and outlines secure to it. The fuel inlet line had been cut during the engine recovery process. The engine driven pump was removed; it did not create inlet suction and outlet pressure when the lever was actuated. The pump was disassembled, the diaphragms were brittle and destroyed consistent with exposure to extreme heat. The fuel pump was filled with engine oil. The left and right magnetos remained secure to the engine accessory housing with the harness caps secure to the magnetos. The magnetos were removed and both drives were found secure via castle nut and cotter pin. The left magneto’s drive was not free to not rotate. While the right magneto’s drive rotated, no spark was observed. Both of the magnetos displayed thermal damage consistent with exposure to the postimpact fire. About 6 gallons of fuel was removed from the right wing fuel tank. The fuel was blue in color and smelled like 100LL fuel. No water or debris was found in the right fuel tank. The left fuel tank was consumed by fire.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during takeoff defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 25, 2025
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,380 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Destination: PGD Punta Gorda FL
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 23, 4,699 ft by 100 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 280° at 19 knots, gusting 28
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 2,600 ft
  • Temperature: 52°F (11°C), dew point 32°F (0°C)
  • Altimeter: 2922.00 inHg
  • Observation at 10:49 am from SCH, 20 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KSCH 311449Z 28019G28KT 10SM OVC026 11/04 A2922

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew11

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.