The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA23LA160 · Final report

Maule M-7-235C accident near Abbeville, South Carolina, March 20, 2023

On March 20, 2023 at about 7:30 pm local time, a 2023 Maule M-7-235C, registered N79VE, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Abbeville, South Carolina (Abbeville Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A loss of directional control during landing, which resulted in a ground loop and substantial damage to the airplane. The pilot flying could not be determined since both pilots claimed that the other was at the controls during the landing. The flight instructor demonstrated poor judgement in accepting the training flight without prior experience in the airplane make and model.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 20, 2023 · about 7:30 pm local time
Place
Abbeville, South Carolina · Abbeville Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured; 1 other was unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Maule M-7-235C, built 2023 · all M-7-235Cs on the register
Registration
N79VE · registry record · serial 25118C
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot/owner of the newly-acquired tailwheel airplane reported that he hired a flight instructor to help him gain proficiency landing on short, narrow runways. He admitted that he was not proficient in this area, although he was current in tailwheel airplanes. He set up for landing on runway 8 with a left crosswind prevailing. He stated that he “arrived too high for the runway.” He stated that the flight instructor did not want him to go around, so the instructor took the controls to demonstrate a slip to lose altitude. The pilot/owner stated that the flight instructor entered a ground loop to the left after touchdown, damaging the airplane. The flight instructor provided a contrary account of the accident sequence. He reported that the pilot/owner had a bad habit of flying with his feet high on the rudder pedals, and he provided guidance prior to the flight to avoid this. Following airwork and takeoff/landing practice at another airport, the pilot attempted a landing at his home airport, which was 2,250 ft long and 40 ft wide. He reported that the pilot/owner, who was at the controls the entire time, overcontrolled the left rudder at 1 ft above the ground during landing, and this occurred so quickly that he was unable to intervene. The right wing contacted the runway, the right main landing gear separated, and the airplane skidded to a stop. A shutdown and egress were then performed. The pilot/owner reported that there was substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage. He also reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation, and the flight instructor did not report any mechanical anomalies in his written statement. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector reported that the flight instructor had no experience in the aircraft make and model prior to the accident flight.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Unknown/Not determined
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total experience w/ equipment › Instructor/check pilot
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Instructor/check pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 849 hours in all; 11 in this make and model; 14 in the last 90 days; 9 in the last 30 days; 748 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 5, 2021
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,025 hours in all; 0 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: BasicMed
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 15 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 10, 2023; 15 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,800 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-540-B4B5 (piston); 15 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: GRD Greenwood SC at 7:15 pm
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 8, 2,250 ft by 39 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 020° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 16°F (-9°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.31 inHg
  • Observation at 3:56 pm from KGRD, 12 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KGRD 201956Z AUTO 02009KT 10SM CLR 12/M09 A3031 RMK AO2 SLP264 T01171089

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew11

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on June 23, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.