The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA16LA145 · Final report

Cessna 175B accident near Hurley, Mississippi, April 2, 2016

On April 2, 2016 at about 10:07 pm local time, a 1960 Cessna 175B, registered N8115T, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Hurley, Mississippi. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The mechanic's failure to identify and remove a plastic sheath covering a portion of the mixture control cable during an annual inspection, which prevented the proper securing of the mixture control cable and full travel of the control at the carburetor and subsequently led to the pilot's inability to properly control the mixture control lever at the carburetor and the resultant partial loss of engine power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 2, 2016 · about 10:07 pm local time
Place
Hurley, Mississippi · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 175B B, built 1960 · all 175Bs on the register
Registration
N8115T · registry record · serial 17556815
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot was flying the airplane on a cross-country flight, which was the first flight after the completion of an annual inspection. The pilot reported that he noted no anomalies during the preflight inspection or engine run-up. After takeoff, the airplane proceeded toward the destination airport between 1,200 and 1,500 ft mean sea level. After levelling off, the pilot slowly leaned the fuel-to-air ratio. The pilot added that, subsequently, the engine rpm "abruptly" decreased from 2,900 to 1,200. The pilot promptly pushed the mixture control to full rich, but this did not restore power. He then twice advanced the throttle, which briefly increased the engine power before it reduced to idle power again. He informed an air traffic controller of the problem, and the controller then provided the pilot with radar vectors to a nearby airport. However, after realizing the airplane would be unable to reach the airport, the pilot chose to execute a forced landing in a field, during which the nose landing gear separated from the airplane. Examination of the engine compartment revealed that the mixture control in the cockpit was in the "full rich" position but that the mixture control lever at the carburetor was at the "idle cutoff" position. Movement of the mixture control in the cockpit resulted in the cable flexing rather than completely moving the mixture control lever at the carburetor, which was due to a plastic sheath that was covering a portion of the mixture control cable; the sheath prevented the cable from being properly secured and also prevented the full movement of the mixture control lever at the carburetor. The plastic sheath was not a part specified in the airplane's parts catalog. During engine test-runs, the engine operated satisfactorily when the mixture control lever at the carburetor was in the "full-rich" position. Given that no other issues were identified during the postaccident test-run, it is likely that the plastic sheath's preventing the proper securing of the mixture control cable and full travel of the control at the carburetor led to the pilot's inability to properly control the mixture control lever at the carburetor and the subsequent partial loss of engine power. Although the mechanic who performed the last inspection indicated that he checked the mixture control for full travel and noted no discrepancies with the mixture control cable, he failed to detect the plastic sheath covering a portion of the mixture control cable, which prevented adequate securing of the cable.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (partial) during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Attempted remediation/recovery during enroute (cruise)
  3. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  4. Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll)
  5. Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
  6. Part(s) separation from AC during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Scheduled/routine inspection › Maintenance personnel
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › Scheduled maint checks › Inadequate inspection
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine controls › Mixture control › Malfunction

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 400 hours in all; 45 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: June 29, 2015
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,989.6 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 1, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,350 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Teledyne Continental GO-300-D (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: MOB Mobile AL at 10:00 pm
  • Destination: ASD Slidell LA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 340° at 15 knots, gusting 20
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 9:56 pm from MOB, 10 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

14 documents, released by the NTSB on April 22, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.