The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB ERA13FA358 · Final report

Rockwell International 690B accident near East Haven, Connecticut, August 9, 2013

On August 9, 2013 at about 3:21 pm local time, a 1978 Rockwell International 690B, registered N13622, was destroyed in an accident near East Haven, Connecticut (Tweed-New Haven Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed while banking aggressively in and out of clouds for landing in gusty tailwind conditions, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and uncontrolled descent.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 9, 2013 · about 3:21 pm local time
Place
East Haven, Connecticut · Tweed-New Haven Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Rockwell International 690B, built 1978 · all 690Bs on the register
Registration
N13622 · no longer on the register · serial 11469
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was attempting a circling approach with a strong gusty tailwind. Radar data and an air traffic controller confirmed that the airplane was circling at or below the minimum descent altitude of 720 feet (708 feet above ground level [agl]) while flying in and out of an overcast ceiling that was varying between 600 feet and 1,100 feet agl. The airplane was flying at 100 knots and was close to the runway threshold on the left downwind leg of the airport traffic pattern, which would have required a 180-degree turn with a 45-degree or greater bank to align with the runway. Assuming a consistent bank of 45 degrees, and a stall speed of 88 to 94 knots, the airplane would have been near stall during that bank. If the bank was increased due to the tailwind, the stall speed would have increased above 100 knots. Additionally, witnesses saw the airplane descend out of the clouds in a nose-down attitude. Thus, it was likely the pilot encountered an aerodynamic stall as he was banking sharply, while flying in and out of clouds, trying to align the airplane with the runway. Toxicological testing revealed the presence of zolpidem, which is a sleep aid marketed under the brand name Ambien; however, the levels were well below the therapeutic range and consistent with the pilot taking the medication the evening before the accident. Therefore, the pilot was not impaired due to the zolpidem. Examination of the wreckage did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Approach-circling (IFR) Aerodynamic stall/spin defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Tailwind › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Gusts › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › High wind › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Residence/building › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,067 hours in all; 999,999 in this make and model; 1,958 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 18, 2013
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,827 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, February 11, 2013
  • Maximum gross weight: 10,325 lb
  • Seats: 8
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Honeywell TPE331-5-251K (turboprop); 4,344 hours total
  • Engine 2: Honeywell TPE331-5-251K (turboprop); 6,659 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: TEB Teterboro NJ at 2:49 pm
  • Destination: HVN East Haven CT
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 20, 5,600 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 170° at 12 knots, gusting 19
  • Visibility: 9 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 900 ft
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
  • Observation at 3:26 pm from HVN, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA13FA358.