The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA11FA287 · Final report

Czech Sport Aircraft As Piper Sport accident near Spring Hill, Florida, May 7, 2011

On May 7, 2011 at about 3:28 am local time, a Czech Sport Aircraft As Piper Sport, registered N420PS, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Spring Hill, Florida. It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's inadvertent application of control inputs that resulted in rapid, right-rolling, negative g-forces during night cruise flight and his subsequent ejection from the airplane. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's decision to fly at night in an airplane not approved for night flight, his unbuckling of the seat belt portion of the restraint harness, and the inadvertent opening of the airplane’s canopy.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 7, 2011 · about 3:28 am local time · cases in 2011
Place
Spring Hill, Florida · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Czech Sport Aircraft As Piper Sport · all Piper Sports on the register
Registration
N420PS · no longer on the register · serial P1001009
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot, who had previously provided flight instruction in the light sport airplane to its two principal owners, was flying it at night from Florida to Illinois. The pilot had flown commercially from Illinois to Florida earlier that day and had been offered lodging by the owners on several occasions but declined. The airplane was not approved for night operations due, in part, to a lack of interior lighting. For over an hour after takeoff, on a clear, dark night, the airplane was headed northbound in straight and level flight at 6,500 feet. The pilot, who had been in contact with an air traffic control facility, had been told to switch to a new radio frequency; afterward radar contact was lost and there were no distress calls from the pilot. The airplane impacted wooded terrain and was mostly consumed by post-impact fire. All flight control surfaces were accounted for at the scene and no preexisting mechanical anomalies were found. There was no evidence of an in-flight fire and no evidence of the pilot attempting to use the whole-airplane ballistic parachute system. The pilot was found about 1/3 mile away from the wreckage, about 600 feet to the right of the airplane's radar track. Numerous personal items were also located to the right of the airplane's radar track, with heavier items generally closer to the track than the lighter items. Shards of bubble-canopy glass and the canopy frame were found at the airplane's impact site, but no shards were noted in the vicinity of where the pilot or the personal items were found, indicating that the canopy was likely unlatched and open when the pilot and the other items exited the airplane. Each seat of the two-seat airplane was equipped with a four-point restraint harness, with each harness having four identical belt adjusting mechanisms: two for the risers and two for the seatbelt portion of the harness. Except for a number of small pieces, both harnesses were almost entirely burned. One surviving piece, for adjusting either a riser or a seat belt portion of the harness, had distorted metal and pulled material, consistent with sudden, forceful loading. The top of the pilot's shoulders also exhibited bruising, indicative of a sudden loading while the harness risers were loosely in place. There were no marks on the pilot's frontal area to indicate that the seat belt portion of the harness was buckled at the time of the loading. Ground testing revealed that access to the back shelf behind the seats would have been difficult to reach if the pilot had not unbuckled the seat belt portion of his restraint harness and loosened the risers. Thus, it is likely that the pilot tried to reach something on the back shelf. Then, at some point afterward, the canopy T-handle likely became unlatched, possibly having been caught by a loose right harness riser or a looped headset wire that plugged in next to the canopy handle. With a dark, noisy cockpit, the pilot likely then inadvertently applied rapid control inputs that resulted right-rolling, negative g-forces of sufficient intensity to eject him and the other personal items.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Windows › windshield system › (general) › Unintentional use/operation other cases naming the airframe structure
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Dark › Effect on operation
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Flight compartment equipment › Not used/operated other cases naming the cabin, seats and restraints
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Flight compartment equipment › Not used/operated other cases naming the cabin, seats and restraints
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,350 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 100 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 14, 2011
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,320 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 912ULS (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: FMY Fort Myers FL at 2:13 am
  • Destination: JOT Joliet IL
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Visibility: 7 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 61°F (16°C), dew point 57°F (14°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.03 inHg
  • Observation at 3:53 am from BKV, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

23 documents, released by the NTSB on August 28, 2012. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Witness Statements PDF, 2 pages View Download
2 Excerpts, FAA Air Traffic Control Accident Package PDF, 6 pages View Download
3 radar Plot - Cruise Flight to Impact PDF, 1 page View Download
4 Items Found on the Ground to the Right of the Airplane's radar Track PDF, 2 pages View Download
5 Record of Conversation PDF, 1 page View Download
6 Pilot's Operating Handbook Supplement 3 PDF, 4 pages View Download
7 Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation PDF, 1 page View Download
8 Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 PDF, 1 page View Download
9 Photo 1 - Exemplar Airplane PDF, 1 page View Download
10 Photo 2 - Exemplar Cockpit PDF, 1 page View Download
11 Photo 3 - Airplane Wreckage, Rear Aspect PDF, 1 page View Download
12 Photo 4 - Airplane Wreckage, Side Aspect PDF, 1 page View Download
13 Photo 5 - Upside-down Fuselage with Non-deployed Ballistic Parachute to Its Right PDF, 1 page View Download
14 Photo 6 - Wreckage Layout; Right, Front Side View PDF, 1 page View Download
15 Photo 7 - Wreckage Layout ; Left Side View PDF, 1 page View Download
16 Photo 8 - Harness Items Found During Initial Visit to Storage Facility PDF, 1 page View Download
17 Photo 9 - Harness Adjustment Mechanism; Stretched Fabric; Distorted Metal Insert PDF, 1 page View Download
18 Photo 10 - Harness Adjustment Mechanism (Reverse Aspect); Stretched Fabric; Distorted Metal Insert PDF, 1 page View Download
19 Photo 11 - Exemplar Restraining Harness with the Harness Items Found During Subsequent Visit to Storage Facility; Recovered Buckle Insert from Unknown Seat Is Different from Exemplar PDF, 1 page View Download
20 Photo 12 - Aft Airframe Attach Hardware for Both Harnesses PDF, 1 page View Download
21 Photo 13 - Volunteer NTSB Pilot the Same Height as Accident Pilot in an Exemplar Airplane; Seat Belt Portion of the Harness Adjusted High on Torso with Belt Buckle Hardware; Up-down Canopy Latch Lever PDF, 1 page View Download
22 Photo 14 - Volunteer Pilot Simulating Negative G with Loose Harness Risers; Risers Pressing Into Tops of Shoulders; Buckled Seat Belt Buckle Pressing Into Frontal Area PDF, 1 page View Download
23 Photo 15 - Volunteer Pilot Loosened Harness Risers and Unbucked Seat Belt Portion to Reach Back; Right Riser Adjustment Harware Abeam Canopy Latch with Canopy Closed; Where Headset Wires Plugged in PDF, 1 page View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/ERA11FA287.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.