The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN25LA381 · Final report

Bell Helicopter Textron Canada 505 accident near Fort Worth, Texas, August 27, 2025

On August 27, 2025 at about 6:10 pm local time, a 2017 Bell Helicopter Textron Canada 505, registered N505GR, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Fort Worth, Texas (Bell South Airfield). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The manufacturer flight instructor’s failure to maintain proper airspeed and a proper descent rate during a demonstrated hover out of ground effect (HOGE) autorotation, which resulted in a hard landing. Contributing to the accident was the manufacturer flight instructor’s failure to perform corrective action during the HOGE autorotation with a power recovery in a timely manner.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 27, 2025 · about 6:10 pm local time
Place
Fort Worth, Texas · Bell South Airfield · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada 505 NO SERIES, built 2017 · all 505s on the register
Registration
N505GR · registry record · serial 65011
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The purpose of the flight with the manufacturer flight training academy was for a flight instructor to provide instruction to another flight instructor, who was a customer. About one hour into the flight at the manufacturer’s private flight training heliport, the manufacturer flight instructor was demonstrating a hover out of ground effect (HOGE) autorotation from a straight-in approach with termination on the lane. This was the first HOGE autorotation for the manufacturer flight instructor of the day. At the time of the maneuver, the manufacturer flight instructor reported the wind direction was variable, and the wind speed was light and variable with no gusting. He reported that he was late entering the HOGE autorotation due to a heliport traffic pattern restriction for noise abatement purposes. Near the end of the HOGE autorotation, with about 35 kts airspeed, he performed a small flare by pulling the nose up slightly. About 45 ft agl, he noticed the descent rate accelerated, requiring him to make a small input with the collective. He further noticed that the descent rate became excessive. About 20 ft agl he began pulling the collective to the top stop and he leveled the skids. The helicopter landed hard on the dry asphalt lane, the skids partially collapsed, and the helicopter came to rest upright on the right side of the lane with little forward motion. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the underside of the fuselage. The manufacturer flight instructor reported there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airframe or the engine that would have precluded normal operation. The manufacturer flight training academy reported that the accident was a mismanagement of the flight controls, and the manufacturer flight instructor should have identified the situation the helicopter was in sooner and executed a power recovery to arrest the descent rate. Postaccident investigation revealed that the manufacturer flight instructor, who had been employed with the manufacturer flight training academy for nine years, did not complete the required flight risk assessment tool before the instructional flight. The estimated density altitude for the closest meteorological reporting station was 2,484 ft.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Simulated/training event during approach (VFR pattern final)
  2. Autorotation Attempted remediation/recovery
  3. Autorotation Hard landing defining event
  4. Evacuation during post (impact)
  5. Autorotation Loss of control in flight

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Instructor/check pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent rate › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Task monitoring/vigilance › Instructor/check pilot
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Instructor/check pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Identification/recognition › Instructor/check pilot

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: helicopter; instructor: instrument helicopter; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 6,855 hours in all; 718 in this make and model; 114 in the last 90 days; 16 in the last 30 days; 5,495 as pilot in command; 4,108 on instruments
  • Last flight review: November 20, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: helicopter; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,120 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, July 18, 2025; 20.6 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,680 lb
  • Seats: 5
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Safran Helicopter Engines Arrius 2R (turboshaft); 2,141 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 0TE2 Hurst TX at 5:15 pm
  • Destination: XS04 Fort Worth TX
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway Lane, 1,600 ft by 60 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 110° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 3,300 ft
  • Temperature: 86°F (30°C), dew point 68°F (20°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.15 inHg
  • Observation at 12:55 pm from KGPM, 8 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KGPM 271755Z AUTO 11005KT 10SM BKN033 30/20 A3015 RMK AO2 T03030203 10303 20211

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Photographs from the investigation 7 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on October 17, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 PDF, 10 pages View Download
2 Investigation Photographs PDF, 8 pages · our copy View Download
3 Accident Flight ADS-B Data - Google Earth (.Kmz File) map file Download
4 Accident Flight ADS-B Data - Microsoft Excel (.Xlsx File) spreadsheet Download
5 Bell Training Academy - Additional Accident Information PDF, 2 pages View Download
6 Bell Training Academy - Accident Flight Video Footage (.Avi File) AVI file Download
7 Bell Training Academy - Maneuver Description Guide Excerpt PDF, 7 pages View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.