The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN18LA093 · Final report

Piper PA 34-220T accident near Patterson, Louisiana, February 6, 2018

On February 6, 2018 at about 11:15 pm local time, a 1988 Piper PA 34-220T, registered N9148B, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Patterson, Louisiana (Harry P Williams Memorial airport). It was an aerial observation flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured; 3 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's inadequate in-flight fuel management, which resulted in a dual loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
February 6, 2018 · about 11:15 pm local time
Place
Patterson, Louisiana · Harry P Williams Memorial · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured; 3 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA 34-220T 220T, built 1988 · all PA 34-220Ts on the register
Registration
N9148B · no longer on the register · serial 3433128
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial observation flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot was conducting an aerial observation flight to photograph an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico that was located about 185 miles southwest of the departure airport. According to the pilot, before departing the operator's base to pick up passengers, fuel was visible "in each tank at the bottom of the sidewall," and the fuel gauges indicated about 45 gallons "a side." The pilot completed the 30-minute flight to pick up the passengers without incident. The rear cabin door was then removed to facilitate the photography. About 40 gallons of fuel remained in each tank at the time of the takeoff after picking up the passengers. The airplane arrived at the oil rig about 1.5 hours after departure; the flight was uneventful. The airplane circled the oil rig for about 1 hour to complete the photography. Afterward, the pilot established a return course. About that time, he noted that the fuel quantity gauges showed less fuel remaining than expected. He leaned the engine mixtures as much as possible and visually examined the airplane for a fuel leak but did not observe any such indication. The pilot elected to deviate to a closer airport due to low fuel. Both engines lost power about 1 hour into the return flight, and the pilot executed a forced landing to a canal, resulting in substantial damage to the airplane. One of the passengers stated that the pilot had informed him that the airplane had not been "topped off" but that sufficient fuel was on board for the flight. A postaccident examination of the airplane did not reveal any anomalies that would have contributed to a dual loss of engine power. During the recovery process, no fuel sheen was observed on the water, and no fuel was observed in the fuel tanks. The total elapsed flight time from the operator's base to the accident site was 3.8 hours. The airplane's owner indicated that the airplane's hour meter ran only when the landing gear was retracted, so the engine run time when the landing gear was extended could not be determined. The pilot's operating handbook for the airplane make and model noted a fuel flow of about 10 gallons per hour for each engine at economy cruise power. The handbook also stated that airplane cruise performance would be reduced by about 5 percent when the airplane was operated with the aft doors removed.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel exhaustion during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,400 hours in all; 460 in this make and model; 110 in the last 90 days; 51 in the last 30 days; 1,020 as pilot in command; 580 on instruments
  • Last flight review: December 9, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,854.6 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, January 12, 2018; 38 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 4,751 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Cont Motor TSIO-360-KB (piston); 983 hours total
  • Engine 2: Cont Motor TSIO-360-KB (piston); 983 hours total
  • Operator: Air Reldan Inc.

The flight

  • Departed from: GAO Galliano LA at 7:47 pm
  • Destination: PTN Patterson LA
  • Flight plan: VFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 150° at 12 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 1,400 ft
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 70°F (21°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.07 inHg
  • Observation at 10:56 pm from PTN, 20 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2
Passengers11

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on March 22, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.