The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN18LA020 · Final report

Bell 206B accident near Groom, Texas, October 24, 2017

On October 24, 2017 at about 8:40 pm local time, a 1976 Bell 206B (helicopter), registered N60EA, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern base) near Groom, Texas. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s decision to operate the helicopter with minimum fuel on board.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 24, 2017 · about 8:40 pm local time
Place
Groom, Texas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell 206B, built 1976 · all 206Bs on the register
Registration
N60EA · registry record · serial 2068
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot of the helicopter stated that there were 20 gallons of fuel on board when he departed on the aerial application flight. He flew to a 43-acre field and made steep turns while spraying the field. After dispensing the chemical, he made a steep, "hard right turn" en route to the operator's base, which was located about 3/4 mile west of the field. About 40 seconds after making the hard right turn and with the fuel gauge indicating 10 gallons remaining, the helicopter was on approach for landing. While on a right base leg to the landing zone and about 40 ft above ground level with about 35 kts airspeed, the pilot felt the "tail wag," and the engine stopped producing power. He performed an autorotation, but the tail impacted the ground during the landing flare, which resulted in substantial damage to the helicopter. During the examination of the helicopter, 2 spoons full of fuel were drained from the airframe fuel filter assembly. When the fuel boost pumps were turned on, they initially sounded as though they were cavitating. With the fuel boost pumps running, 7 gallons of fuel were drained from the fuel tank through the airframe fuel filter assembly. The engine was removed from the airframe and placed on a test cell, where it operated normally. The helicopter flight manual stated that, if installed, the FUEL LOW light would illuminate with about 20 gallons of fuel remaining. It stated that, if this light illuminated, the pilot should, "Land as soon as practical." The flight manual also contained a warning that, "Operation with both fuel boost pumps inoperative is not authorized. Due to possible fuel sloshing in unusual attitudes or out of trim conditions and one or both fuel boost pumps inoperative, the unusable fuel is 10 gallons." It is likely that the engine experienced a total loss of power due to fuel starvation; however, the reason for the fuel starvation was not determined. The pilot decided to operate the helicopter with less than 20 gallons of fuel, and 7 gallons of fuel were found in the helicopter after the accident occurred. The final, steep right turn likely was uncoordinated, and it might have caused the fuel pickup in the tank to become unported, allowing air into the fuel line. However, the pilot reported that the boost pump circuit breakers were in, and they should have been able to deliver fuel to the fuel filter assembly.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel starvation during approach (VFR pattern base) defining event
  2. Autorotation Hard landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › (general) › Not specified
  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 897 hours in all; 280 in this make and model; 160 in the last 90 days; 42 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: March 16, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 9,062 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, October 10, 2017
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,201 lb
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rolls-Royc 250-C20B (turboshaft); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: Groom TX
  • Destination: Groom TX
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 340° at 18 knots, gusting 27
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 19°F (-7°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.39 inHg
  • Observation at 8:30 pm from PPA, 23 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N60EA the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2016-04-07CEN16WA147 · accident near Suwalki · substantial damage · serious injuries
2002-07-06CHI02LA181 · accident near Three Rivers, MI · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.