The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN18FA262 · Final report

Schempp-Hirth Flugzeugbau GMBH VENTUS 3F accident near Moriarty, New Mexico, July 10, 2018

On July 10, 2018 at about 9:07 pm local time, a 2017 Schempp-Hirth Flugzeugbau GMBH VENTUS 3F (glider), registered N753R, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Moriarty, New Mexico (Moriarty Municipal Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's exceedance of the glider's critical angle of attack during a low-altitude turn, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and subsequent impact with terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 10, 2018 · about 9:07 pm local time
Place
Moriarty, New Mexico · Moriarty Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Schempp-Hirth Flugzeugbau GMBH VENTUS 3F, built 2017
Registration
N753R · no longer on the register · serial 017FS
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot was conducting a local flight in his motorglider in day visual meteorological conditions. Another glider pilot in the area reported hearing the accident pilot announce over the radio that he was not getting any lift and was going to stay near the airport. About 2 hours after the pilot departed on the flight, a witness on the ground saw the glider as she was driving near the airport. The glider was in a nose-down attitude very close to the ground; she thought that it might be landing. She subsequently turned her car and lost sight of the glider. A search was initiated when the glider did not return to the airport as expected, and the wreckage was located about 1/2 mile southeast of the airport. The glider was equipped with a FLARM, which is an onboard collision avoidance system that recorded the glider's flight track, altitude, groundspeed, and engine noise level (ENL). The ENL value increased during the last 4 minutes of flight and then began to fluctuate during the last 13 seconds, both of which are indicative of engine use. FLARM data that were sent to a ground station indicated that, about 11 seconds before impact, the glider entered a left descending turn about 560 ft above ground level; the turn continued until just before impact. The FLARM data could not be correlated with the glider's airspeed, thus the glider's airspeed during the turn could not be determined. Witness marks on the ground and the structural damage observed at the scene indicated that the glider impacted the ground with the left wingtip immediately followed by the left wing, the engine and propeller, and cockpit. The upward and aft crushing damage was consistent with the glider impacting the terrain in a steep nose down attitude, characteristic of a low-altitude aerodynamic stall. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of preimpact anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The accident pilot had purchased the glider several months before the accident. Although he had logged over 1,300 hours of flight experience in gliders , the pilot had logged less than 10 hours in the accident glider. Based on the impact damage, it is likely that during the left descending turn, after the last recorded data from the FLARM, the airplane pitch exceeded the critical angle of attack resulting in an aerodynamic stall causing the glider to descend to the ground in a steep nose down pitch attitude.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during maneuvering defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 1,332 hours in all; 8.5 in this make and model; 8.1 in the last 90 days; 4 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: October 1, 2016
  • Medical certificate: None
  • Seat: sngl
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 21, 2018; 8 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,323 lb
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Fes M100 (electric); 8 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 0E0 Moriarty NM at 7:12 pm
  • Destination: 0E0 Moriarty NM
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 11,000 ft
  • Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.36 inHg
  • Observation at 7:52 pm from ABQ, 30 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

19 documents, released by the NTSB on October 21, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.