Cirrus Design CORP SR22 accident near Watertown, Wisconsin, December 27, 2015
On December 27, 2015 at about 10:56 pm local time, a 2006 Cirrus Design CORP SR22, registered N5PF, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Watertown, Wisconsin. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s improper in-flight fuel management, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s failure to switch fuel tanks after the engine lost power, and his delayed decision to activate the airframe parachute system, which resulted in his serious injury due to incomplete deployment of the system and the airplane’s improper attitude upon touchdown.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- December 27, 2015 · about 10:56 pm local time
- Place
- Watertown, Wisconsin · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was seriously injured.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cirrus Design CORP SR22, built 2006
- Registration
- N5PF · registry record · serial 1904
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The private pilot had spent several hours flying practice instrument approaches to various airports. He stated that he became distracted and failed to monitor the airplane's fuel state. His normal habit was to alternate between the airplane's wing fuel tanks every 30 minutes; however, he did not perform this action during the last hour of the accident flight. Shortly after takeoff to return to his home airport in night visual meteorological conditions, the airplane's engine experienced a total loss of power. The pilot turned back toward the departure airport, but the airplane did not have sufficient altitude to complete a power-off glide to the runway. The pilot stated that he did not switch the airplane's fuel selector following the loss of engine power. About 344 ft above ground level, the pilot activated the airplane's airframe parachute system. The low-altitude activation resulted in an incomplete deployment of the parachute and a nose-down impact with the ground, during which the pilot sustained serious injury. The pilot stated that there were no mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. Postaccident examination revealed that the airplane's fuel system was intact. The right wing tank, which was selected, contained about 21 oz of fuel, and the left wing tank contained about 22 gallons. Therefore, the total loss of engine power was consistent with fuel starvation.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (total) during enroute defining event
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain)
The NTSB's findings
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › (general) › Unintentional use/operation
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Workload management › (general) › Pilot
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of checklist › Pilot
- factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 2,871 hours in all; 1,647 in this make and model; 17 in the last 90 days; 7 in the last 30 days; 2,765 as pilot in command; 0 on instruments
- Last flight review: January 30, 2015
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: serious injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 1,540 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, October 14, 2015; 17 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 3,400 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Cont Motor IO-550-N (piston); 1,540 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: RYV Watertown WI at 10:50 pm
- Destination: ENW Kenosha WI
- Flight plan: IFR
Weather at the time
- Light: night
- Wind: from 010° at 7 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: overcast at 2,600 ft
- Temperature: 32°F (0°C), dew point 25°F (-4°C)
- Altimeter: 30.38 inHg
- Observation at 10:55 pm from KRYV, 4 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
11 documents, released by the NTSB on April 27, 2017. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Arial Views of Flight Path | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Flight Data Downloaded from PDF | data file | Download |
| 4 | Cockpit Displays Recorded Flight Data Factual Report | PDF, 8 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Attachment 1 - Cockpit Displays Factual Report | data file | Download |
| 6 | Police Photos of Airplane at the Accident Site | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 7 | Correspondence with Pilot | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 8 | Statement from Mechanic on Site | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 10 | Fuel System Information - Cirrus SR22 Pilot Operating Handbook | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 11 | Caps Deployment Information - Cirrus SR22 Pilot Operating Handbook | PDF, 6 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
