The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN15FA034 · Final report

Raytheon Aircraft Company B200 accident near Wichita, Kansas, October 30, 2014

On October 30, 2014 at about 2:48 pm local time, a 1999 Raytheon Aircraft Company B200, registered N52SZ, was destroyed in an accident during initial climb near Wichita, Kansas (Wichita Mid-Continent airport). It was a ferry flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain lateral control of the airplane after a reduction in left engine power and his application of inappropriate rudder input. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's failure to follow the emergency procedures for an engine failure during takeoff. Also contributing to the accident was the left engine power reduction for reasons that could not be determined because a postaccident examination did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation and thermal damage precluded a complete examination.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 30, 2014 · about 2:48 pm local time
Place
Wichita, Kansas · Wichita Mid-Continent · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Raytheon Aircraft Company B200, built 1999
Registration
N52SZ · no longer on the register · serial BB-1686
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Ferry flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airline transport pilot was departing for a repositioning flight. During the initial climb, the pilot declared an emergency and stated that the airplane "lost the left engine." The airplane climbed to about 120 ft above ground level, and witnesses reported seeing it in a left turn with the landing gear extended. The airplane continued turning left and descended into a building on the airfield. A postimpact fired ensued and consumed a majority of the airplane. Postaccident examinations of the airplane, engines, and propellers did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Neither propeller was feathered before impact. Both engines exhibited multiple internal damage signatures consistent with engine operation at impact. Engine performance calculations using the preimpact propeller blade angles (derived from witness marks on the preload plates) and sound spectrum analysis revealed that the left engine was likely producing low to moderate power and that the right engine was likely producing moderate to high power when the airplane struck the building. A sudden, uncommanded engine power loss without flameout can result from a fuel control unit failure or a loose compressor discharge pressure (P3) line; thermal damage prevented a full assessment of the fuel control units and P3 lines. Although the left engine was producing some power at the time of the accident, the investigation could not rule out the possibility that a sudden left engine power loss, consistent with the pilot's report, occurred. A sideslip thrust and rudder study determined that, during the last second of the flight, the airplane had a nose-left sideslip angle of 29°. It is likely that the pilot applied substantial left rudder input at the end of the flight. Because the airplane's rudder boost system was destroyed, the investigation could not determine if the system was on or working properly during the accident flight. Based on the available evidence, it is likely that the pilot failed to maintain lateral control of the airplane after he reported a problem with the left engine. The evidence also indicates that the pilot did not follow the emergency procedures for an engine failure during takeoff, which included retracting the landing gear and feathering the propeller. Although the pilot had a history of anxiety and depression, which he was treating with medication that he had not reported to the Federal Aviation Administration, analysis of the pilot's autopsy and medical records found no evidence suggesting that either his medical conditions or the drugs he was taking to treat them contributed to his inability to safely control the airplane in an emergency situation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (partial) during initial climb defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent
  3. Loss of control in flight during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Lateral/bank control › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action selection › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Engine out control › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop) › (general) › Not specified
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Identification/recognition › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,139 hours in all
  • Last flight review: September 19, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, October 22, 2014; 1.4 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 12,500 lb
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney PT6A-42 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney PT6A-42 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground
  • Operator: Gilleland Aviation Inc

The flight

  • Departed from: ICT Wichita KS at 2:47 pm
  • Destination: MEZ Mena AR
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 01R, 7,301 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 350° at 16 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 15,000 ft
  • Temperature: 59°F (15°C), dew point 37°F (3°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.12 inHg
  • Observation at 2:53 pm from KICT

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.