The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN12LA345 · Final report

Learjet INC 60 accident near Aspen, Colorado, June 7, 2012

On June 7, 2012 at about 6:24 pm local time, a 1993 Learjet INC 60, registered N500SW, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Aspen, Colorado (Aspen-Pitkin County Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 8 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The first officer’s failure to maintain adequate airspeed and his exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle-of-attack during the final approach in known low-level windshear conditions, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident were the first officer’s failure to initiate a go-around when commanded and the captain's lack of remedial action when he recognized that the approach was unstabilized.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 7, 2012 · about 6:24 pm local time
Place
Aspen, Colorado · Aspen-Pitkin County Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 8 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Learjet INC 60, built 1993
Registration
N500SW · registry record · serial 017
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

While the first officer was flying the airplane on a visual approach to the airport located in a steep mountain valley, the tower controller informed him that the pilot of a Citation that had landed about 10 minutes earlier had reported low-level windshear with a 15-knot loss of airspeed on short final. The first officer used the spoilers while on the left base leg and then maneuvered the airplane in an "S-turn" on the final leg to correct for a too-steep approach. Just as the airplane was about to touch down with the airspeed decreasing, the captain made several calls for "power" and then called for a "go around." However, the first officer did not add power for a go-around, and the captain did not take control of the airplane. Both pilots reported that, when the airplane was about 30 ft above ground level (agl), they felt a sensation that the airplane had "stopped flying" with a simultaneous left roll, which is indicative of an aerodynamic stall, followed by an immediate impact with terrain. After striking obstructions that completely separated the right main landing gear and the right flap, the airplane came to rest upright in the dirt on the side of the runway about 4,000 ft from the initial impact point. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. All eight occupants evacuated through the main cabin door. There was a substantial fuel spill but no postimpact fire. Both pilots reported no mechanical malfunctions or failures of the airplane, and neither pilot reported an uncommanded loss of engine power. Data from the enhanced ground proximity warning system showed that seven warning events occurred in the last 3 minutes before the accident. The first warning was for "sink rate," and it occurred when the airplane was about 1,317 ft agl and in a 3,400-ft-per-minute descent. The last warning was for "bank angle," and it occurred about 10 seconds before touchdown as the airplane exceeded 42 degrees of bank when it was about 200 ft agl. The wind recorded at the airport at the time of the accident would have resulted in a 12-knot variable tailwind with gusts to 18 knots. The evidence is consistent with the first officer flying a nonstabilized approach with a decreasing airspeed during low-level windshear conditions. The first officer did not properly compensate for the known low-level windshear conditions and allowed the airspeed to continue to decrease and the bank angle to increase until the airplane experienced an aerodynamic stall.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aerodynamic stall/spin during landing defining event
  2. Abnormal runway contact during landing
  3. Runway excursion during landing
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing
  5. Part(s) separation from AC during post (impact)
  6. Hazardous material leak/spill during post (impact)
  7. Evacuation during post (impact)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Copilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action selection › Copilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action selection › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Windshear › Effect on operation
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 18,000 hours in all; 600 in this make and model; 50 in the last 90 days; 20 in the last 30 days; 16,000 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: January 1, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 13,500 hours in all; 25 in the last 90 days; 14 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: May 27, 2010
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,456 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, January 30, 2012; 136 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 23,500 lb
  • Seats: 10
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pwc 305 (turbofan); 5,941 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pwc 305 (turbofan); 6,359 hours total
  • Operator: Performance Aircraft Leasing INC

The flight

  • Departed from: OPF Miami FL at 2:20 pm
  • Destination: ASE Aspen CO
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 15, 7,006 ft by 100 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 020° at 7 knots, gusting 16
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 21°F (-6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.12 inHg
  • Observation at 5:53 pm from KASE

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2
Passengers6

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.