The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ANC18FA044 · Final report

Piper PA18 accident near Sitka, Alaska, June 9, 2018

On June 9, 2018 at about 4:00 am local time, a 1951 Piper PA18, registered N1203A, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Sitka, Alaska. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack for unknown reason, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and a loss of control.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 9, 2018 · about 4:00 am local time
Place
Sitka, Alaska · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA18, built 1951 · all PA18s on the register
Registration
N1203A · no longer on the register · serial 18-811
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was flying a lodge client on a wildlife viewing flight in a floatplane. About 2 hours after the planned return time, the airplane was reported overdue and a search was coordinated. The airplane wreckage was located nose down in a confined shallow river the next day. The airplane did not have GPS, ADS-B or a recording system, and there was no radar coverage in the area of the accident; therefore, the flight track was unknown. The airplane impacted the river bottom in a 70 ° nose down attitude with the front floats absorbing much of the energy and the aft fuselage displaced and twisted right, indicative of impact during a stall/spin. All flight controls were intact and continuous, and the engine exhibited no anomalies. The propeller blades exhibited rearward bends with torsional twist and some chordwise scrapes, and propeller strikes were evident on deadfall trees trunks at the initial impact site, which are all indications of impact with engine power. The right fuel tank cap was not located but given that there was evidence of engine power at impact, it is unlikely that fuel siphoning/exhaustion was causal. It is likely that the pilot was maneuvering the airplane in slow flight to show the passenger wildlife, and, in doing so, exceeded the airplane's critical angle of attack, resulting in the stall. The airplane was equipped with 4-point shoulder harnesses on both seats; however, first responders reported that the pilot did not have the shoulder harness fittings inserted into the lapbelt buckle. The rear seat passenger was ejected during the impact and examination of the shoulder harnesses for his seat revealed no indication of deformation of the webbing or metal end fittings, indicating he was also likely not using the shoulder harnesses at the time of impact. His lapbelt buckle however, was deformed although it was fully functional.  It is possible that the use of the shoulder harnesses may have prevented the rear seat passenger's ejection and/or mitigated some of the occupants' injuries had they been in use at the time of the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Unknown or undetermined during maneuvering
  2. Aerodynamic stall/spin during maneuvering defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during enroute

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Capability exceeded
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Flight compartment equipment › Incorrect use/operation
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Passenger compartment equip › Incorrect use/operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,640 hours in all; 140 in this make and model; 1,600 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 1
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: fatal

Passenger

  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,244.9 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 28, 2017; 3 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,499 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320 E2D (piston); 1,300 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: A29 Sitka AK
  • Destination: A29 Sitka AK
  • Flight plan: VFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 300° at 13 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 5,000 ft
  • Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.89 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

9 documents, released by the NTSB on October 9, 2020. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N1203A the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2012-06-16ANC12CA052 · accident near Willow, AK · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.