Amateur-built RANS S-7S COURIER accident near Benson, Arizona, April 22, 2024
On April 22, 2024 at about 4:42 pm local time, a 2019 amateur-built RANS S-7S COURIER, registered N599YY, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Benson, Arizona (Benson Muni/Paul Kerchum Fld airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s unintentional use of a winter-blend fuel that was susceptible to vaporization, which resulted in fuel starvation and a loss of engine power due to vapor lock. Contributing to the accident was the airplane’s undersized fuel lines, which limited the available fuel flow and volume.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- April 22, 2024 · about 4:42 pm local time
- Place
- Benson, Arizona · Benson Muni/Paul Kerchum Fld · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built RANS S-7S COURIER, built 2019
- Registration
- N599YY · registry record · serial 0510343
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot was evaluating the airplane’s engine performance with a different fuel after changes were made to the fuel system. Shortly after a normal takeoff, the pilot noticed a low fuel pressure warning. The engine subsequently sustained a partial and then total loss of power. The pilot restarted the engine, and it momentarily produced power. As he advanced the throttle, the engine again stopped producing power. During an off-airport landing, the main landing gear collapsed. On previous flights, the engine had produced less power than the pilot expected. In response, he performed an engine examination and observed lead deposits on the exhaust valves. He contacted the engine manufacturer, who recommended switching from 100LL avgas to unleaded auto fuel. The pilot then created a mixture of winter-blend auto fuel and a small, precise amount of 100LL avgas. An examination of the engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the fuel system revealed that the inside diameter of the fuel supply and return lines were smaller than recommended by the engine manufacturer. This undersized condition limited the volume of fuel available to the engine. A small fuel leak was discovered at an exit fitting in one of the fuel pumps. Investigators could not determine if the leak existed before the accident or if it was a result of impact forces. Additionally, the vent tube in the left-wing fuel tank was obstructed and did not permit airflow until investigators inserted a small wire several inches into the tube, after which the vent permitted air passage. Accident flight data recorded by the airplane’s engine monitoring device revealed that the fuel pressure and flow both declined slowly as the flight progressed and became increasingly erratic. Shortly thereafter, a sudden and complete loss of both fuel pressure and flow occurred. When the pilot attempted to restart the engine, the available fuel pressure and flow was insufficient to sustain engine operation. Recorded data from the flight was consistent with air bubbles present in the fuel system, followed by fuel starvation due to vapor lock. After an operational test of the engine, several firewall-mounted fuel-system components (including the gascolator, fuel filters, electric fuel pumps, and associated metal fuel lines) that had been positioned near the engine exhaust system remained hot for more than 20 minutes after engine shutdown. Under these heat-soaked conditions, investigators noted that the fuel pumps required an extended period to achieve priming, and the fuel exiting the pumps initially appeared cloudy and aerated before gradually clearing as normal pressure and flow were restored. The pumps emitted abnormal noises consistent with cavitation during the period when cloudy, vapor-entrained fuel was present. The locally procured auto fuel was a winter blend, which is formulated in a manner that makes it susceptible to vaporization at warmer fuel temperatures. Because the fuel was routed through metal fuel system components exposed to exhaust heat, the fuel in the system was likely heated to a temperature that resulted in vaporization. Although the investigation also found a small leak at a fuel line exit fitting and a blocked vent tube in the left-wing fuel tank, the engine data and postaccident engine testing was consistent with fuel vaporization. The vaporization of the fuel likely led to a vapor-lock condition and subsequent fuel starvation.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Off-field or emergency landing during landing
- Landing gear collapse during landing
- Fuel starvation during initial climb defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine fuel and control › Fuel distribution › Design
- Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Incorrect use/operation
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 235 hours in all; 40 in this make and model; 153 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: December 16, 2022
- Medical certificate: BasicMed
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 39 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, April 21, 2024; 3 hours since
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Ul Power 350IS (piston); 43 hours total
The flight
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 130° at 5 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 28°F (-2°C)
- Altimeter: 29.91 inHg
- Observation at 9:55 am from KDMA, 25 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KDMA 221655Z AUTO 13005KT 10SM CLR 29/M02 A2991 RMK AO2 SLP129 T02931020 $
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Photographs from the investigation 5 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them
Photograph 1 – Airplane Final Position and Damage
Photograph 2 – Airplane Final Position and Damage
Photograph 3 – Airplane Final Position
Photograph 4 – Airplane Final Position
Photograph 5 – Airplane Final PositionThe NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
8 documents, released by the NTSB on April 3, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Photos | PDF, 9 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 3 | Record of Conversations | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Fuel Supplement | PDF, 8 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Vapor Lock Analysis Data Reference | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 6 | EFIS Ems Flight Data | data file | Download |
| 7 | Airframe and Engine Examination Report | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Accident Data Timeline | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
