The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR20LA301 · Final report

Lake LA4 accident near Rawlins, Wyoming, August 25, 2020

On August 25, 2020 at about 1:00 pm local time, a 1977 Lake LA4, registered N93AB, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Rawlins, Wyoming (Rawlins Muni/Harvey Field). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed and 3 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s decision to depart despite a known mechanical trim malfunction and with a high-density altitude and the airplane at or above its maximum gross weight.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 25, 2020 · about 1:00 pm local time
Place
Rawlins, Wyoming · Rawlins Muni/Harvey Field · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed and 3 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Lake LA4 200, built 1977 · all LA4s on the register
Registration
N93AB · no longer on the register · serial 835
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that, during a flight on the day before the accident, a trim anomaly caused the airplane to enter a nose-down pitch attitude and descend. The pilot had to manually reset the trim position about every 8 seconds to maintain level flight and prevent the airplane from prematurely descending. After landing, the pilot had a discussion with a mechanic to troubleshoot the mechanical issue, and no anomalies were identified. Before the accident takeoff, one of the two passengers had the airplane fueled with 20 gallons of fuel, for total fuel of 30 gallons. The pilot thought that the airplane was fueled with 12 gallons, for a total fuel of 22 gallons. This miscommunication between the pilot and passenger resulted in the airplane being fueled more than the pilot expected, which likely resulted in the airplane being near or slightly over the maximum allowable gross weight at the time of takeoff. The pilot performed a short-field takeoff during the accident flight. The pilot reported that, when the airplane reached an altitude of about 500 ft above ground level, he experienced an “abnormal heaviness” in the control wheel that was consistent with the pitch trim anomaly during the flight on the day before. The airplane would not climb any further, so the pilot made a left turn back to the runway, during which the airplane descended and subsequently collided with terrain. Postaccident examination of the trim actuator revealed an anomaly of the O-rings, which prevented the hydraulic pressure from maintaining the desired trim position. Consequently, the trim surface could move without command and could thus not hold the required takeoff position. In addition, the density altitude at the time of the accident takeoff was about 8,600 ft mean sea level, and the airplane was close to its maximum allowable gross weight. The effects of highdensity altitude conditions and a heavy airplane weight on takeoff performance include increased takeoff roll distance and reduced rate of climb. It is likely that while the pilot was dealing with a high-density altitude takeoff which may have affected the performance of the engine, he did not adequately monitor the trim that was not holding its required takeoff position and that he knew was malfunctioning before departure.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during takeoff
  2. Flight control sys malf/fail during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › (general) › Malfunction
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › High density altitude › Effect on equipment
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Maximum weight › Not specified

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea
  • Flight time: 507 hours in all; 52 in this make and model; 69 in the last 90 days; 52 in the last 30 days; 396 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: July 8, 2020
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,100 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 3, 2020
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,600 lb
  • Seats: 3
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360 (piston); 1,162 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RWL Rawlins WY at 1:00 pm
  • Destination: 1U7 Paris ID
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 29, 4,322 ft by 60 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 240° at 13 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 39°F (4°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.25 inHg
  • Observation at 12:53 pm from KRWL

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers12

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

21 documents, released by the NTSB on September 7, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.