Amateur-built RV4 accident near Safford, Arizona, June 9, 2020
On June 9, 2020 at about 3:46 pm local time, a 1997 amateur-built RV4, registered N173CW, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Safford, Arizona (Safford Rgnl airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
A loss of pitch control during the landing approach due to a jammed elevator control system.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- June 9, 2020 · about 3:46 pm local time
- Place
- Safford, Arizona · Safford Rgnl · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built RV4, built 1997
- Registration
- N173CW · no longer on the register · serial 95-1736
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot was performing a routine flight over mountainous desert terrain to a destination he had flown to multiple times before. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, with light winds and no turbulence. ADS-B flight track information indicated that the airplane entered a nominal descent profile toward the destination airport; however, about 1 mile from the end of the presumed landing runway, the airplane began a rapid descent into rising terrain. After colliding with the ground, the airplane continued uphill 300 ft until coming to rest about 1/2 mile short and 40 ft below the approach end of the runway. The considerable distance travelled uphill after striking terrain indicated a relatively flat impact attitude and engine power at impact. The rapid descent rate suggests that the pilot may have encountered pitch control difficulties; however, examination of the airframe did not reveal any evidence of primary flight control anomalies or a bird strike. The pitch trim system in the rear of the airplane was intact and functional; however, impact damage sustained to the front of the airplane precluded a complete determination of the pitch trim system state. The airplane’s flaps were found fully extended, but flight track information indicated that the airplane did not slow to its flap deployment speed at any point during the approach. Damage to the flap electrical system prevented an accurate assessment of its operational status; therefore, an unintended deployment of the flaps could not be ruled out. However, under a runaway flap condition, the actuator motor would have deployed the flaps slowly, and flight testing revealed that any pitch-down forces caused by the flap deployment both with and without full nose-down trim would have been easily overcome by the pilot with the application of aft control stick forces. Further, at full extension, the flaps tended to act as air brakes. It is possible that he deployed the flaps intentionally to slow the airplane while struggling with a pitch anomaly. During the examination, a foreign object (position light socket) that had previously been removed from the airplane was found in the lower underfloor bay of the aft seat, in an area that would have been occupied by the rear control column assembly. Although the forward control stick was fitted with a boot, the aft stick was not, leaving an open area into the control stick assembly. It is possible that either the socket or another unidentified object dropped into the open area and interfered with the free movement of the control stick, resulting in a pitch control jam and a rapid descent.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Miscellaneous/other during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Elevator control system › Damaged/degraded
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Pitch control › Attain/maintain not possible
Pilot
- Certificate: military, private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 7,003.7 hours in all; 250 in this make and model; 35.7 in the last 90 days; 9.7 in the last 30 days
- Last flight review: January 18, 2020
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: frt
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 1,406.7 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, September 13, 2019; 50 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 1,500 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-320 (piston); 50 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: TUS Tucson AZ at 3:10 pm
- Destination: SAD Safford AZ
- Flight plan: VFR
- Runway 30, 6,007 ft by 100 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 230° at 4 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 10°F (-12°C)
- Altimeter: 30.14 inHg
- Observation at 8:51 am from KSAD, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): METAR KSAD 091551Z AUTO 23004KT 10SM CLR 21/M12 A3014 RMK AO2 SLP164 T02111122=
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
17 documents, released by the NTSB on September 20, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
