The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR14CA352 · Final report

Rans Aircraft S 6S accident near Rigby, Idaho, August 22, 2014

On August 22, 2014 at about 5:30 pm local time, a 2005 Rans Aircraft S 6S, registered N171CT, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Rigby, Idaho (Rigby airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot's loss of directional control during takeoff in gusting wind conditions. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor's failure to intervene and apply corrective flight control inputs.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 22, 2014 · about 5:30 pm local time
Place
Rigby, Idaho · Rigby · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Rans Aircraft S 6S SUPERSIX, built 2005
Registration
N171CT · no longer on the register · serial 11021467
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The light sport flight instructor was providing flight instruction to the owner of the experimental, amateur-built, tailwheel-equipped light sport airplane. The airplane was equipped with side-by-side seating; the owner sat in the left seat and was the flying pilot, and the instructor sat in the right seat. They departed the home, non-towered airport and flew uneventfully to an airport with an operating air traffic control tower, where they practiced landings and takeoffs. They then returned to the home airport for additional landings and takeoffs. All portions of the flight through that point were uneventful. After returning to, and making at least one landing back at the home airport, the pilot was attempting a takeoff from runway 19. Either at or shortly after liftoff, the airplane was struck by an "unexpected wind gust," which resulted in a loss of directional control. The student pilot was unable to regain control, and the flight instructor did not physically intervene, before the airplane struck a hangar located about 270 feet from the runway centerline. The right wing sustained substantial damage when it struck the hangar. The airplane then passed between that hangar and an adjacent one. The flight instructor did not offer any explanation as to why he did not intervene. The measured wind at an airport located about 10 miles southwest of the accident airport was reported as 320 degrees at 8 knots about 37 minutes prior to the accident, and as 090 degrees at 3 knots about 23 minutes after the accident. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during takeoff defining event
  2. Runway excursion during takeoff
  3. Attempted remediation/recovery during takeoff
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during takeoff

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student/instructed pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Instructor/check pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Gusts › Effect on operation
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Residence/building › Contributed to outcome

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: sport pilot
  • Flight time: 1,587 hours in all; 87 in this make and model; 57 in the last 90 days; 22 in the last 30 days; 1,400 as pilot in command; 167 on instruments
  • Last flight review: May 1, 2013
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 21 hours in all; 21 in this make and model; 13 in the last 90 days; 6 in the last 30 days; 5 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Sport Pilot
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 468 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, May 10, 2014
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,200 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 912S (piston); 468 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: KIDA Idaho Falls ID at 5:15 pm
  • Destination: U56 Rigby ID
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 19, 3,500 ft by 50 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 320° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 10,000 ft; ovct at 10,000 ft
  • Temperature: 57°F (14°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.07 inHg
  • Observation at 4:53 pm from KIDA, 10 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.