Cirrus SR22 accident near Ruston, Louisiana, October 21, 2025
On October 21, 2025 at about 2:44 pm local time, a 2012 Cirrus SR22, registered N42BE, was destroyed in an accident during maneuvering near Ruston, Louisiana (Ruston Rgnl airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this accident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- October 21, 2025 · about 2:44 pm local time
- Place
- Ruston, Louisiana · Ruston Rgnl · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
- Aircraft
- Cirrus SR22, built 2012 · all SR22s on the register
- Registration
- N42BE · registry record · serial 3903
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record
On October 21, 2025, about 0944 central daylight time, a Cirrus SR22, N42BE, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Ruston, Louisiana. The private pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to preliminary ADS-B and communications data obtained from the FAA, the airplane departed from Huntsville Municipal Airport (UTS), Huntsville, Texas at 0830 with a destination of Ruston Regional Airport (RSN), Ruston, Louisiana. Air traffic control (ATC) cleared the airplane for the RNAV RWY 36 approach, which the pilot acknowledged, but shortly thereafter the pilot requested a go-around. The controller cleared the pilot to climb, maintain 2,000 ft and to turn right to a heading 120°. The controller asked the pilot if the visibility or ceilings were too low and the pilot responded that he was having “a little trouble with my autopilot there getting that programmed in.” The controller asked the pilot to verify the airplane’s heading and provided a low altitude alert. The controller then again asked the pilot to verify the heading and asked the pilot if he was flying using the autopilot or “hand flying.” The pilot responded that he was “hand flying” the airplane. There were no further communications received from the pilot. The accident site was located in heavily wooded terrain 2 1/2 miles southeast from the beginning of runway 36. The airplane first contacted a 60 ft tall tree before contacting three other trees at altitudes of 30 ft, 27ft, and 24 ft, respectively. According to data recovered from the airplane’s recoverable data module (RDM), the airplane was in a left bank and nose low attitude at the time of impact. The impact crater was located 30 ft southeast from the initial tree strike and was 2 ft in depth and 6 ft in circumference. The main debris field was 330 ft long and 60 ft wide and along a 103° heading, with debris extending outwards. A postcrash fire consumed portions of the fuselage, wings, and empennage. Fuel blighting was visible on vegetation throughout the debris field. The engine was impact separated and located beyond the impact crater and to the left side of the main debris path. According to RDM data, the engine was producing 2500 rpm (91% power), and all cylinder head temperatures and exhaust gas temperatures were consistent with normal engine operation at the time of the accident. Both magnetos were impact separated from the engine and were not recovered. A large hole consistent with impact damage was observed on the crankcase above the number 2 and 4 cylinders. One counterweight was visible through the crankcase hole and was unremarkable. A connecting rod was visible through the hole and remained secured to the crankshaft. The top spark plugs sustained impact damage and were removed for further investigation. The no. 4 cylinder top spark plug electrode was absent. The remaining top spark plug electrodes showed wear and coloration consistent with normal engine operation. The oil filter was impact separated from the engine but remained attached to the accessory housing via safety wire and had minor carbon debris was visible within the pleats when examined. The engine would not rotate as a result of impact damage and impacted organic material. All six cylinders had dirt and organic matter pressed between the cooling fins. The intake pipes for all six cylinders were impact separated. The exhaust stacks were impact damaged and impact separated. Cylinders 5 and 6 had impact damage to the cylinder heads and were missing rocker box covers. The propeller and crankshaft flange were separated from the engine and found adjacent to the impact crater. The three-bladed metal propeller displayed “S” bending and rotational scoring consistent with high rpm settings. One propeller blade was missing the blade tip. The spinner dome was missing from the propeller. The airplane was equipped with a Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS) that was found partially deployed consistent with impact during the accident sequence. The parachute remained packed in its bag, but the parachute cables were extended. The ballistic rocket was found at the furthest end of the debris field, 330 ft from the initial tree impact. The CAPS handle within the cockpit was in the stowed position. The ground safety pin was not installed in the handle. The wreckage was retained for additional examination.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Navigation error during approach (IFR final approach)
- Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during maneuvering defining event
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 1,487.1 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, August 15, 2025
- Maximum gross weight: 3,400 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Fire on the ground
- Operator: Lasalle Management Company LLC
The flight
- Departed from: UTS Huntsville TX at 1:30 pm
- Flight plan: IFR
- Runway 36, 6,002 ft by 100 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 340° at 9 knots
- Visibility: 7 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 2,100 ft; a few clouds at 400 ft
- Temperature: 68°F (20°C), dew point 68°F (20°C)
- Altimeter: 30.08 inHg
- Observation at 9:35 am from RSN, 3 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KRSN 211435Z AUTO 34009KT 7SM -RA FEW004 BKN021 OVC033 20/20 A3008 RMK AO2 RAB1431 CIG 016V025 PRESRR P0000 T01960196=
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
