The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA23LA064 · Final report

Beech 95-B55 (T42A) accident near Athens, Georgia, November 3, 2022

On November 3, 2022 at about 10:55 pm local time, a 1974 Beech 95-B55 (T42A), registered N101DC, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Athens, Georgia (Athens/Ben Epps airport). It was a business flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The operator’s and the pilot’s continued operation of the airplane with a known electrical problem, resulting in a loss of electrical power and a gear-up landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 3, 2022 · about 10:55 pm local time
Place
Athens, Georgia · Athens/Ben Epps · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech 95-B55 (T42A), built 1974 · all 95-B55 (T42A)s on the register
Registration
N101DC · no longer on the register · serial TC-1666
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Business flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was at 7,000 ft mean sea level (msl), in cruise flight, when he noticed electrical problems with the airplane. Night, visual meteorological conditions prevailed. He recalled that some of the displays on his navigation system were not functioning, he was hearing air traffic control (ATC) only intermittently, and his transponder was not operating normally. He contacted ATC and was given directions to a nearby airport. As he set up for an approach, he perceived that his engines were losing power and he needed full throttle to maintain safe airspeed. He could not read the engine instruments since it was dark and assumed a loss of engine power based on his tablet computer’s display. He attempted to lower the landing gear with the manual extension handcrank; however, he had difficulty accessing the handcrank and moving it. After landing, the airplane skidded to a stop on the runway with the landing gear retracted, resulting in substantial damage to the lower fuselage.  The manual extension handcrank was used to lower the landing gear after the accident and it operated in a normal manner. After charging the aircraft battery, the engines were started and ran up to 2,100 rpm each. Troubleshooting of the alternators revealed that the 2-amp fuse for the left alternator was blown, preventing that alternator from functioning. Also, the field wire for the right alternator was found disconnected, preventing that alternator from functioning. Once investigators replaced the blown fuse and reattached the field wire, both alternators functioned normally. The postaccident engine test runs did not reveal evidence of a mechanical malfunction or anomaly that would have precluded normal operation. When interviewed after the accident, the pilot reported that the airplane had been flown for the last 10 days with both alternator warning lights continuously illuminated in the cockpit and with unreliable load meters. When the pilot brought the electrical issues up with his supervisor and with maintenance personnel, he was told to keep flying the airplane because it was being used to transport cargo and there was fear that the operator would lose the contract. He stated that management pressured him to fly the airplane, telling him that there was nothing wrong with it.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Electrical system malf/failure during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Landing gear not configured during landing (flare/touchdown)

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Electrical power system › AC generator › alternator › Damaged/degraded
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Organizational issues › Management › Culture › Pressures/demands › Operator

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 625 hours in all; 43 in this make and model; 55 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 457 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: October 28, 2022
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,592 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, February 1, 2022; 84 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 5,100 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Continental IO-470-L (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Continental IO-470-C21 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Innovative Scientific Solutions LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: MGM Montgomery AL at 5:10 pm
  • Destination: GMU Greenville SC
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 27, 6,122 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: dusk
  • Wind: from 080° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 61°F (16°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.25 inHg
  • Observation at 6:51 pm from KAHN

Weather report (METAR): METAR KAHN 032351Z 08003KT 10SM CLR 16/12 A3025 RMK AO2 SLP242 T01610117 10239 20161 53005

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on April 25, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.