The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA17LA205 · Final report

Cessna P206 accident near West Creek, New Jersey, June 13, 2017

On June 13, 2017 at about 2:55 am local time, a 1966 Cessna P206, registered N206TF, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern downwind) near West Creek, New Jersey (Eagles Nest Airport). It was an other work-use flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's improper fuel management, which resulted in fuel starvation and the subsequent total loss of engine power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 13, 2017 · about 2:55 am local time
Place
West Creek, New Jersey · Eagles Nest Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna P206 A, built 1966 · all P206s on the register
Registration
N206TF · no longer on the register · serial P206-0289
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Other work-use flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot was on the second leg of a postmaintenance flight. The first flight leg, which was about 1-hour long, was uneventful, and the pilot reported that the fuel selector was positioned to the right tank during this flight leg. He landed the airplane but did not purchase fuel before departing for the return leg. The pilot reported that, during the return leg, the fuel selector was positioned to the left tank. While on final approach to the airport, the pilot added power to go around. He turned onto the crosswind and then downwind legs of the airport traffic pattern, and while on the downwind leg, the engine lost all power. The pilot switched the fuel selector to the right tank, but engine power was not restored. Realizing that the airplane would be unable to reach the runway, the pilot conducted a forced landing in trees, and the airplane came to rest inverted. During postaccident examination, more than the unusable amount of fuel was drained from the left fuel tank, which was breached in two locations; only about 6 ounces of fuel were drained from the unbreached right fuel tank. No fuel was found in the engine-driven fuel pump or the flow divider, which is indicative of fuel starvation. Examination of the fuel supply system revealed no evidence of preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. The engine was started and operated briefly using the fuel that had been drained from the airplane with no discrepancies noted. Although the pilot stated that he conducted the entire second flight leg with the fuel selector positioned to the left tank and then switched to the right tank after the engine lost power, the fuel selector was found positioned to the left tank, which had more than the unusable amount of fuel. Therefore, it is likely that the pilot was approaching the airport with the fuel selector positioned to the right tank, which ran out of fuel, and that he then switched to the left tank too late to restore engine power. Given this and the lack of fuel in the engine-driven fuel pump and flow divider, it is likely that the pilot mismanaged the fuel, which resulted in the loss of all engine power.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel related during approach (VFR pattern downwind) defining event
  2. Loss of engine power (total) during approach (VFR pattern downwind)
  3. Attempted remediation/recovery during approach (VFR pattern downwind)
  4. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  5. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent
  6. Nose over/nose down during landing (flare/touchdown)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tree(s) › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,050 hours in all; 20 in this make and model; 89 in the last 90 days; 61 in the last 30 days; 930 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: April 9, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 11,950.8 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, March 8, 2017; 34 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental IO-520-A (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: DXR Danbury CT at 2:00 am
  • Destination: 31E West Creek NJ
  • Flight plan: VFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: not reported
  • Wind: from 240° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.98 inHg
  • Observation at 2:56 am from MJX, 16 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on July 24, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.