The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA13CA008 · Final report

Bombardier INC DHC-8-315 accident near Kabul, Af, October 17, 2012

On October 17, 2012 at about 6:49 am local time, a Bombardier INC DHC-8-315, registered N800AW, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Kabul (Kabul International Airport). It was a public-use flight (federal) under public-use (government) rules. No one was hurt; 7 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

the captains ineffective management of the airplanes energy state during final approach and flare that resulted in a hard landing and tail strike at touchdown.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 17, 2012 · about 6:49 am local time · cases in 2012
Place
Kabul, Afghanistan · Kabul International Airport · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 7 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bombardier INC DHC-8-315
Registration
N800AW · registry record · serial 573
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Public-use flight (federal) · public-use (government) rules

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

On October 17, 2012, about 1119 local time, 0649 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), a Bombardier DHC-8-315, registration N800AW, operated by the United States Department of State, experienced a hard landing on runway 29 at Kabul International Airport (OAKB) Kabul, Afghanistan. There were no injuries to the three passengers or three crewmembers onboard and the aircraft was substantially damaged. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time. The flight had originated from Tarin Kowt Airport (OATN), Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan According to the flight crew, the takeoff, climb and cruise were uneventful. The captain was the flying pilot. At 11:12 the flight was cleared for the approach and at 11:16 the flight crew selected flaps 35 and initiated a random steep approach in accordance with company task procedures as a result of the airport threat level. According to the flight crew statements, the airplane engine power was reduced to idle for the approach and was not increased prior to landing. Information obtained from Flight Data Recorder (FDR) indicated engine torque was at or near zero for the last 5 minutes of approach and landing. The aviation routine weather report at 0550 local time indicated wind from 120 degrees at 5 knots, 8000 meters visibility and temperature 17 degrees C. For the two minutes prior to landing, the wind was light and variable. A tactical meteorological observation system on the field reported the wind direction during the two minutes prior to landing as variable from 004 degrees to 137 degrees and the wind speed variable from 1 knot to 7.2 knots. Wind gust recorded during the time period varied from 050 degrees to 079 degrees at 7.0 to 7.2 knots. Based on FDR data the calculated rate of descent was about 2,000 feet per minute during approach, reducing to about 1,500 feet per minute just prior to landing. The airplane touched down with a nose up pitch attitude of approximately 8 degrees and a peak vertical acceleration of 2.7g. The airplane geometry information provided by the manufacturer indicated that aft fuselage contact will result from a pitch attitude over 11.9 degrees with an extended landing gear oleo strut, and a pitch attitude over 6.8 degrees with a compressed landing gear oleo strut. In order to avoid nuisance warnings resulting from the random steep approach (i.e. steep angle descent), the flight crew deactivated the ground proximity warning system (GPWS) for approach. As these alerts would be expected by the crew during this type of approach, it is unlikely the alerts would have prompted the crew to take corrective action. The airplane touched down and contacted the aft fuselage on the runway resulting in substantial damage (including buckled, cracked, and bent frames and stringers).

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Miscellaneous/other during approach (VFR pattern final)
  2. Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event
  3. Tailstrike during landing (flare/touchdown)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 10,545 hours in all; 855 in this make and model; 95 in the last 90 days; 18 in the last 30 days; 10,103 as pilot in command; 1,037 on instruments
  • Last flight review: June 16, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 15,730 hours in all; 8,333 in this make and model; 142 in the last 90 days; 92 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: May 22, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 18,533 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, September 22, 2012
  • Seats: 48
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt and Whitney PW123E (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt and Whitney PW123E (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Operator: US Department of State

The flight

  • Departed from: OATN Tarin
  • Destination: OAKB Kabul
  • Flight plan: VFR
  • Runway 29, 11,483 ft by 148 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 160° at 2 knots, gusting 4
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.27 inHg
  • Observation at 11:16 am from OAKB

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew4
Passengers3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

8 documents, released by the NTSB on April 3, 2013. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N800AW the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2004-03-19NYC04LA088 · accident near Utica, NY · substantial damage · no injuries
1988-01-10CHI88FA041 · accident near Pontiac, MI · destroyed · fatal

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Record

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/DCA13CA008.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.