The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA12FA024 · Final report

Bell 214 accident near Camp Bastion, Af, January 16, 2012

On January 16, 2012 at about 6:15 am local time, a Bell 214 (helicopter), registered N5748M, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (climb to cruise) near Camp Bastion. It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). 3 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

the overtravel of the collective sleeve, which led to a severe and sudden reduction in main rotor blade collective pitch, resulting in a loss of control of the helicopter. The reason for the collective sleeve overtravel could not be determined since much of the collective control system was consumed in the post crash fire.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 16, 2012 · about 6:15 am local time
Place
Camp Bastion, Afghanistan · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
3 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell 214 ST · all 214s on the register
Registration
N5748M · no longer on the register · serial 28102
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

Witness accounts from the flight crew of the helicopter flying behind the accident helicopter indicated that, after both helicopters had climbed to an altitude between about 800 to 1,000 feet, the accident helicopter rolled sharply to the right and entered a steep, nose-down pitch, at which time the aft tailboom separated from the helicopter. The helicopter's nose-down pitch attitude continued until ground impact. There was no evidence of abnormal engine operation at the time of the accident or a failure of the tail rotor system or a major airframe structural component before the in-flight breakup. The damage observed on the right collective lever arm, idler link, and collective sleeve bearing support assemblies were consistent with an overtravel of the collective sleeve, which resulted in a severe and sudden reduction in main rotor collective pitch. Also, the damage to the left and right sides of the idler link showed that the left and right collective lever arms were in their installed position at the time of the collective sleeve overtravel. Bell Helicopter Textron's math model simulation of the Bell 214 helicopter's response to a sudden and severe reduction of main rotor collective pitch (resulting from a failure of the collective flight control system) showed that the helicopter would respond with a severe right roll and a simultaneous nose-down pitch attitude. The math model simulation also showed that a sudden and severe reduction of main rotor collective pitch would cause the main rotor hub to exceed its flapping angle and the main rotor blade tips to deflect downward and possibly contact the tailboom due to the reduced amount of clearance. The results of the math model simulation were closely aligned with the witness accounts from the flight crew of the helicopter behind the accident helicopter and the damage observed on the helicopter wreckage. For example, the nose-down pitch and right roll observed in the math model simulation was similar to the reported pitch and roll of the accident helicopter when the accident sequence began. Also, the main rotor mast showed damage consistent with mast bumping that resulted when the main rotor hub significantly exceeded its flapping angle. Thus, the evidence showed that, when the accident helicopter's main rotor hub exceeded its flapping angle, the resulting loss of clearance between the main rotor system blades and the tailboom caused the main rotor blades to contact the tailboom. This contact was severe enough to cause the aft tailboom section to completely separate from the rest of the tailboom, leading to a loss of pitch control.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during enroute (climb to cruise)
  2. Flight control sys malf/fail during enroute (climb to cruise)
  3. Loss of control in flight during enroute (climb to cruise) defining event
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
  5. Fire/smoke (post-impact) during post (impact)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Main rotor system › Main rotor mast/swashplate › Failure
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Main rotor system › Main rotor head system › Failure
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Pitch control › Attain/maintain not possible
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Fuselage › Rotorcraft tail boom › Damaged/degraded

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 11,538 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 11, 2011
  • Maximum gross weight: 17,500 lb
  • Seats: 10
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine 1: General Electric CT7-2A (turboshaft); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: General Electric CT7-2A (turboshaft); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: Camp Bastion
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.