The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN25LA231 · Final report

Grumman Acft Eng Cor-Schweizer G-164B accident near Lockport, Louisiana, July 1, 2025

On July 1, 2025 at about 4:45 pm local time, a 1975 Grumman Acft Eng Cor-Schweizer G-164B, registered N8834H, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Lockport, Louisiana. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s inadequate planning for the high density altitude conditions which resulted in reduced airplane performance, climb capability, and subsequent forced landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 1, 2025 · about 4:45 pm local time
Place
Lockport, Louisiana · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Grumman Acft Eng Cor-Schweizer G-164B, built 1975 · all G-164Bs on the register
Registration
N8834H · registry record · serial 1B
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that on the morning of the accident he flew two previous aerial application flights in the airplane without issue. The outside air temperature and humidity had increased since his first two flights, and he estimated that the temperature at the time of the accident was 93°F. The pilot sprayed a few fields while enroute to the final field and estimated that the airplane had about 35 gallons (210 lbs) of fuel and about 160 gallons (1,334 lbs) of liquid applicant in the hopper before arriving to the final field. He descended into the target field and completed one spray pass. As the airplane approached the end of the field, he increased airplane pitch but “noticed the plane not climbing as normal” despite all the engine gauges depicting normal indications. The airplane descended as it approached a highway, but the pilot did not want to dump the hopper over the highway or the adjacent bayou. The airplane cleared a set of powerlines next to the highway, landed hard in a field, and then nosed over. The airplane substantial damage to the fuselage, empennage, wings, and engine mount. Postaccident examination of the airplane did not reveal any mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Since there were no anomalies found during the examination and the pilot confirmed that the engine gauges depicted normal indications during the flight, it is likely that the engine was operating normally at the time of the accident. Based on available information, the airplane’s weight at the time of the accident was likely near the airplane’s maximum gross weight limitation. The calculated density altitude for the accident flight was about 2,353 ft, which would have further degraded the airplane’s climb performance and ability to maintain altitude.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Low altitude operation/event during maneuvering defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › High density altitude › Contributed to outcome
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Climb capability › Capability exceeded
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Maximum weight › Capability exceeded
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Performance calculations › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,751.3 hours in all; 13.7 in the last 90 days; 13.7 in the last 30 days; 2,737.6 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 12, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,050.7 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, June 1, 2025; 5 hours since
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Pratt & Whitney R1340-53H1G (piston); 8,045 hours total
  • Operator: AG Air LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: Raceland LA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 240° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 7 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 2,800 ft
  • Temperature: 90°F (32°C), dew point 75°F (24°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.08 inHg
  • Observation at 11:47 am from KHUM, 10 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KHUM 011647Z 24007KT 7SM FEW028 32/24 A3008=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

8 documents, released by the NTSB on August 19, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN25LA231.