The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB CEN25LA045 · Final report

Cessna R182 accident near Crowley, Louisiana, November 18, 2024

On November 18, 2024 at about 8:35 pm local time, a 1979 Cessna R182, registered N738PG, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Crowley, Louisiana (A J Patrol airport). It was a business flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s un-stabilized landing approach and high airspeed during the approach, that resulted in touchdown with insufficient runway remaining to stop the airplane.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 18, 2024 · about 8:35 pm local time
Place
Crowley, Louisiana · A J Patrol · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Cessna R182, built 1979 · all R182s on the register
Registration
N738PG · registry record · serial R18200949
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Business flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he was returning from a pipeline patrol flight and was landing to the south on the north-south oriented grass runway which was wet from recent rain. He said that upon touchdown the airplane “yanked” to the left and began sliding on the wet grass. He could not stop the airplane because of the reduced braking action due to the wet runway. The airplane impacted a hangar located at the south end of the runway and the right wing sustained substantial damage. The operator reported that he had witnessed the accident. He noted that the weather conditions were getting worse and were approaching instrument meteorological conditions. He saw the airplane approach from the north to land to the south on the north-south oriented runway. Initially the airplane was lined up on a field to the east of the runway and he then saw the airplane attempt to turn and line up with the runway. He noted that the airplane appeared lower and faster than normal. After the airplane turned toward the runway, it touched down about halfway down the 2,500 ft. runway and was about 45° from runway alignment. The airplane then started to skid sideways on the wet grass. The airplane tires then regained grip and the airplane darted to the side and impacted the hangar at the south end of the runway. The operator stated that the pilot did not report any problem with the rudder trim system either before or after the accident. Well after the accident, the pilot stated that the rudder trim on the airplane was not operating correctly, and the skid-slip ball was not centered during the flight. He said the rudder trim wheel had no tension. He reported no other mechanical issues with the airplane. The pilot’s report of the rudder trim system issues was not provided until after the airplane was no longer available for examination of the rudder trim system. Regardless, the rudder trim should not have inhibited the pilot from maintaining directional control of the airplane while landing on the wet runway. The reported weather conditions at a nearby airport included a broken ceiling of 700 ft. above ground level (agl), an overcast ceiling at 1,300 ft. agl, and 7 miles visibility.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Miscellaneous/other during approach
  2. Abnormal runway contact during landing (flare/touchdown)
  3. Landing area overshoot during landing (landing roll) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent/approach/glide path › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Runway/land/takeoff/taxi surface › Wet surface › Effect on operation
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 750 hours in all; 350 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-540-J3C5D (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 18/3, 2,400 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 140° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 7 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 700 ft
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 75°F (24°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.72 inHg
  • Observation at 2:35 pm from KIYA, 16 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KIYA 182035Z AUTO 14009KT 7SM BKN007 OVC013 24/24 A2972 RMK AO2 OVC V BKN T02380238=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN25LA045.