The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN24FA089 · Final report

Cessna 310R accident near Poolville, Texas, January 14, 2024

On January 14, 2024 at about 6:15 pm local time, a 1975 Cessna 310R, registered N252DL, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (descent) near Poolville, Texas (Bridgeport Municipal Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 3 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Pilot incapacitation for undetermined reasons which resulted into controlled descent into terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 14, 2024 · about 6:15 pm local time
Place
Poolville, Texas · Bridgeport Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
3 people were killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Cessna 310R, built 1975 · all 310Rs on the register
Registration
N252DL · registry record · serial 310R0242
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

Before departing on an instrument-flight-rules (IFR) cross-country flight, the pilot obtained a standard weather briefing of the forecast and observed weather conditions along the flight route, which included AIRMETs for moderate icing between the departure and destination airports during the time of the filed IFR flight plan. The airplane was likely in instrument meteorological conditions during the descent between 6,000 ft and 3,000 ft msl in moderate or greater icing with supercooled large droplets. Below 3,000 ft, the accident flight was likely in visual meteorological conditions and below freezing temperatures. During the descent, ATC attempted to communicate with the pilot for about 7 minutes with no response from the pilot. The descent profile was controlled on a relatively straight heading and the witness marks on the ground, damage to the airplane, and distribution of the wreckage were consistent with controlled flight into terrain. The airplane impacted a field in a relatively level attitude. The airplane may have accumulated some ice while descending through the cloud layer. However, the ½ mile long wreckage path from initial impact with the ground to where the main wreckage came to rest is not consistent with loss of control due to ice accumulation. The witness seeing the airplane flying parallel to the ground in a wings level attitude also suggests that the airplane did not depart controlled flight. Due to the fragmentation and thermal damage to the airplane, functional tests of the system were not possible; however, there was no evidence to suggest a preimpact anomaly with the flight controls or engines which would have precluded normal operations. The pilot’s moderate coronary artery disease conveyed some increased risk of a sudden impairing or incapacitating cardiovascular event, such as chest pain, arrhythmia, or heart attack. The autopsy did not provide specific evidence that such an event occurred; however, such an event does not leave reliable autopsy evidence if the event occurs shortly before death. Ethanol levels measured by two laboratories were elevated to a relatively similar degree in vitreous fluid and urine, indicating a possibility that the pilot may have consumed alcohol and may have been impaired by ethanol effects at the time of the accident or while engaged in earlier activities related to the safety of flight. However, cautious interpretation of the alcohol results is prudent, given the extent of the pilot’s injuries, the fact that only two specimen types were tested for ethanol, and the detection of other volatiles in both of those specimen types. It is possible that some or all of the detected ethanol may have been from postmortem sources rather than alcohol consumption. Although toxicological results also indicated that the pilot had used the medication cetirizine, no determination could be made from the medical evidence indicating whether the pilot might have been experiencing some associated sedation at the time of the accident. Based on the available evidence, it is possible that the pilot became incapacitated during the descent. The reason for the incapacitation could not be determined.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during enroute (descent)
  2. Medical event during enroute (descent) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Physical › Impairment/incapacitation › (general) › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 309 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 11, 2023
  • Maximum gross weight: 5,500 lb
  • Seats: 5
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Continental IO-520-M (piston); 3,300 hours total
  • Engine 2: Continental IO-520-M (piston); 5,005 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: CZT Carrizo Springs TX at 4:58 pm
  • Destination: XBP Bridgeport TX
  • Flight plan: IFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 350° at 9 knots, gusting 17
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 3,100 ft
  • Temperature: 12°F (-11°C), dew point -6°F (-21°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.34 inHg
  • Observation at 12:15 pm from KXBP, 12 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KXBP 141815Z AUTO 02006KT 10SM OVC030 M11/M21 A3034

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers2

Photographs from the investigation 9 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

19 documents, released by the NTSB on February 11, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Wreckage Summary PDF, 5 pages · our copy View Download
2 Photos PDF, 10 pages · our copy View Download
3 Electronics Devices-email Report PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
4 Weather Factual Report PDF, 30 pages · our copy View Download
5 Weather Attachment 1 - GOES-16 Visible Imagery Animation from 1031 to 1231 Cst GIF file · our copy Download
6 Weather Attachment 2 - Zfw Pdwb Valid at the Accident Time zip file · our copy Download
7 Weather Attachment 3 - Fip and Cip Information Valid for the Accident Site zip file · our copy Download
8 Weather Attachment 4 - ForeFlight Information PDF, 3 pages · our copy View Download
9 Weather Attachment 5 - ForeFlight Briefing Information zip file · our copy Download
10 ADS-B Data spreadsheet · our copy Download
11 Witness Statements PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
12 Flight Track Data map file · our copy Download
13 Descent Profile PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
14 ATC Transmission Excerpt PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
15 Toxicological Report PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
16 Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
17 Pilot Logbook and Medical PDF, 9 pages · our copy View Download
18 Maintenance Records PDF, 5 pages · our copy View Download
19 Party Form PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download

The same docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.