The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB CEN23LA363 · Final report

Beech C-99 accident near Lansing, Michigan, August 15, 2023

On August 15, 2023 at about 12:05 pm local time, a 1983 Beech C-99, registered N261SW, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Lansing, Michigan (Captial Regional International airport). It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to properly set the rudder trim position which resulted in a loss of directional control during takeoff. Contributing was the pilot’s inadequate checklist procedures prior to takeoff.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 15, 2023 · about 12:05 pm local time
Place
Lansing, Michigan · Captial Regional International · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Beech C-99, built 1983 · all C-99s on the register
Registration
N261SW · no longer on the register · serial U-202
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that after a normal start and taxi, the airplane was cleared for takeoff. During the takeoff roll, the airplane drifted right and the pilot corrected with the left rudder. When the airplane reached 100 knots, he rotated the airplane, and about 30 feet in altitude, the airplane experienced a roll to the right. The pilot tried to correct the roll with left rudder but was unable to provide sufficient left rudder. At this point, the airplane had drifted to the right of the runway and over the adjacent parallel taxiway. He was able to regain partial control by reducing engine power and banking the airplane to the left. The pilot attempted to land on the taxiway but was unable to judge his height above ground due to the low visibility, and subsequently impacted terrain to the right of the taxiway. Both wings and the fuselage sustained substantial damage. Prior to exiting the airplane, the pilot noted that the rudder trim was set to the full nose-right position. The pilot reported no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Prior to the accident, maintenance was completed that consisted of an “Event II & Routine” inspection. The inspection procedure required the rudder trim system to be lubricated, a trim tab free play inspection, and an operational check prior to returning the airplane to service. Review of the maintenance procedures revealed there was no guidance on returning the rudder trim control system back to a neutral position at completion of the inspection.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during initial climb defining event
  2. Aircraft maintenance event during prior to flight
  3. Preflight or dispatch event during prior to flight
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during initial climb

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Rudder tab control system › Incorrect use/operation
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Preflight inspection › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of checklist › Pilot
  • Organizational issues › Management › Policy/procedure › Adequacy of policy/proc › Operator
  • Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › Return to service › Related maintenance info
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,218 hours in all; 26 in this make and model; 66 in the last 90 days; 26 in the last 30 days; 397 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: August 4, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 27,642.9 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme, August 14, 2023
  • Maximum gross weight: 11,300 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney PT6A-36 (turboprop); 27,162 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney PT6A-36 (turboprop); 31,804 hours total
  • Operator: Ameriflight, LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: LAN Lansing MI at 12:00 pm
  • Destination: KPLN Pellston MI
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 10R, 8,506 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 040° at 18 knots, gusting 27
  • Visibility: 0.8 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 3,900 ft; scat at 1,100 ft
  • Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 59°F (15°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.80 inHg
  • Observation at 8:26 am from KLAN, 1 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KLAN 151226Z 04018G27KT 1 3/4SM R28L/6000VP6000FT +RA BR SCT011 BKN039 OVC080 17/15 A2980 RMK AO2 PK WND 05027/1225 P0008 T01670150=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN23LA363.