The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN22LA148 · Final report

Cessna 182 accident near Moberly, Missouri, March 15, 2022

On March 15, 2022 at about 8:00 pm local time, a 1965 Cessna 182, registered N8585S, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Moberly, Missouri (Omar N. Bradley Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot's improper landing flare, which resulted in a bounced hard landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 15, 2022 · about 8:00 pm local time
Place
Moberly, Missouri · Omar N. Bradley Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 182 J, built 1965 · all 182s on the register
Registration
N8585S · registry record · serial 18256685
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The solo student pilot reported that, during touchdown, the airplane bounced twice before he added power, and landed without further incident. A postaccident examination revealed the underside of the fuselage sustained substantial damage. The student pilot reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student/instructed pilot
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Student/instructed pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare › Not attained/maintained

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 36 hours in all; 27 in this make and model; 27 in the last 90 days; 3 in the last 30 days; 2 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 15, 2022
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,693.7 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 17, 2021
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,800 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental Motors O-470 -R (piston); 4,693 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 31, 5,000 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 4,900 ft
  • Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.14 inHg
  • Observation at 2:55 pm from KMBY

Weather report (METAR): KMBY 151955Z AUTO 00000KT 10SM BKN049 18/05 A3014 RMK AO2

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

3 documents, released by the NTSB on April 19, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.