The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB CEN18LA115 · Final report

Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm BK 117 B-2 accident near Sheboygan, Wisconsin, March 5, 2018

On March 5, 2018 at about 5:24 am local time, a 1988 Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm BK 117 B-2 (helicopter), registered N1174U, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach near Sheboygan, Wisconsin (Sheboygan County Memorial airport). It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The restricted cyclic control movement for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examination and testing of the cyclic control system did not reveal any evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 5, 2018 · about 5:24 am local time
Place
Sheboygan, Wisconsin · Sheboygan County Memorial · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm BK 117 B-2, built 1988 · all BK 117 B-2s on the register
Registration
N1174U · registry record · serial 7146
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

Before departure on the air ambulance flight, standard flight control and hydraulic transfer checks were performed with no anomalies noted with the flight controls. The helicopter’s hover, departure, and cruise were normal. During his approach to the hospital, the pilot started a slow descent using the collective and performed the before landing checks; all systems were normal. However, when attempting to decelerate from cruise speed, the pilot noticed restricted cyclic control movement, about 1 inch in any direction, with normal collective and yaw control movement. He then chose to abort the descent and execute a precautionary landing at a nearby airport. During the short flight to the airport, the pilot cycled the hydraulic test switch twice with no change noted to his flight controls. During the approach to land, the pilot held the cyclic trim switch aft in an attempt to gain additional aft cyclic authority. With continuous cyclic pressure against the aft stop, the pilot was able to slow the helicopter to 80 knots on final approach. The helicopter touched down near the runway centerline, skidded about 500 ft, exited the runway surface, and came to rest upright. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the main rotor blades and fuselage structure. Postaccident examination of the helicopter’s flight control system, including the trim system, did not reveal any evidence of malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operations. The cyclic trim was found in the full forward and left position. The flight control dual hydraulic pack was functionally tested on the helicopter and at a repair facility with no anomalies noted. Thus, the reason for the restricted cyclic control movement could not be determined.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during approach defining event
  2. Hard landing during landing
  3. Runway excursion during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 5,684 hours in all; 84 in this make and model; 18 in the last 90 days; 8 in the last 30 days; 3,746 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: June 5, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,613 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme, February 15, 2018
  • Maximum gross weight: 7,385 lb
  • Seats: 7
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine 1: Honeywell LTS-101 (turboshaft); 7,517 hours total
  • Engine 2: Honeywell LTS-101 (turboshaft); 8,965 hours total
  • Operator: Air Methods Corporation

The flight

  • Departed from: FLD Fond Du Lac WI at 4:57 am
  • Destination: SBM Sheboygan WI
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 13, 5,002 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Wind: from 110° at 9 knots, gusting 18
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 36°F (2°C), dew point 25°F (-4°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.34 inHg
  • Observation at 5:53 am from SBM

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN18LA115.